开源软件构建与测试

_service:tar_scm:rpm.spec Changed

_service:tar_scm:backport-Fix-a-memleak-on-invalid-command-line-options.patch Added

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+From 1825dbf8244b129665a69481c4537a57b9e03a8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
+Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:07:05 +0200
+Subject: PATCH Fix a memleak on invalid command line options
+ 
+ The OS will clean it up yes, but in the meanwhile ASAN (when enabled)
+ blew up on your face and scared you silly. Use the opportunity to add a
+ test for a test on invalid option.
+
+---
+ lib/poptALL.c       | 11 ++++++++---
+ tests/rpmgeneral.at | 10 +++++++++-
+ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/lib/poptALL.c b/lib/poptALL.c
+index b24c13e..a2bbedc 100644
+--- a/lib/poptALL.c
++++ b/lib/poptALL.c
+@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ rpmcliFini(poptContext optCon)
+ poptContext
+ rpmcliInit(int argc, char *const argv, struct poptOption * optionsTable)
+ {
+-    poptContext optCon;
++    poptContext optCon = NULL;
+     int rc;
+     const char *ctx, *execPath;
+ 
+@@ -336,14 +336,14 @@ rpmcliInit(int argc, char *const argv, struct poptOption * optionsTable)
+     while ((rc = poptGetNextOpt(optCon)) > 0) {
+ 	fprintf(stderr, _("%s: option table misconfigured (%d)\n"),
+ 		xgetprogname(), rc);
+-	exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++	goto err;
+     }
+ 
+     if (rc < -1) {
+ 	fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\n", xgetprogname(),
+ 		poptBadOption(optCon, POPT_BADOPTION_NOALIAS),
+ 		poptStrerror(rc));
+-	exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++	goto err;
+     }
+ 
+     /* Read rpm configuration (if not already read). */
+@@ -355,4 +355,9 @@ rpmcliInit(int argc, char *const argv, struct poptOption * optionsTable)
+     }
+ 
+     return optCon;
++
++err:
++    poptFreeContext(optCon);
++    exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
++    return NULL; /* not reached */
+ }
+diff --git a/tests/rpmgeneral.at b/tests/rpmgeneral.at
+index cf1f507..4281315 100644
+--- a/tests/rpmgeneral.at
++++ b/tests/rpmgeneral.at
+@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ RPMTEST_CHECK(runroot rpm --version,0,
+ )
+ RPMTEST_CLEANUP
+ 
+-
+ # ------------------------------
+ AT_SETUP(rpmbuild --version)
+ AT_KEYWORDS(basic)
+@@ -35,6 +34,15 @@ RPMTEST_CHECK(runroot rpmbuild --version,0,
+ )
+ RPMTEST_CLEANUP
+ 
++AT_SETUP(rpm invalid option)
++AT_KEYWORDS(basic)
++AT_CHECK(runroot rpm --badopt,
++1,
++,
++rpm: --badopt: unknown option
++)
++AT_CLEANUP
++
+ # Check that libtool versioning matches expectations, it's easy to screw up.
+ AT_SETUP(rpm library version)
+ AT_KEYWORDS(basic)
+-- 
+2.33.0
+

_service:tar_scm:backport-Let-eBPF-ELF-files-be-packaged-in-noarch-packages.patch Added

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+From 5ece87a250880b08ccecfc5b34986347d8cca843 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
+Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:44:51 +0200
+Subject: PATCH Let eBPF ELF files be packaged in noarch packages
+ 
+ eBPF ELF represents a virtual machine where our file colors make no
+ sense at all. Filter out the color from these files to avoid a
+ "Arch dependent binaries in noarch package" error from them in noarch
+ packages.
+ 
+ We don't want to pull in clang to the check images just because of
+ this, so add a pre-built binary for the check and a simple way to
+ reproduce from the test-spec.
+ 
+ Fixes: #2875
+
+Reference:https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/5ece87a250880b08ccecfc5b34986347d8cca843
+Conflict:Deleted binary files and test code because it would add clang
+Requires.
+---
+ build/rpmfc.c | 7 +++++++
+ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/build/rpmfc.c b/build/rpmfc.c
+index 07171fa..6d40a19 100644
+--- a/build/rpmfc.c
++++ b/build/rpmfc.c
+@@ -1151,6 +1151,13 @@ static uint32_t getElfColor(const char *fn)
+ 		color = RPMFC_ELF32;
+ 		break;
+ 	    }
++
++	    /* Exceptions to coloring */
++	    switch (ehdr.e_machine) {
++	    case EM_BPF:
++		color = 0;
++		break;
++	    }
+ 	}
+ 	if (elf)
+ 	    elf_end(elf);
+-- 
+2.33.0
+

Changes of Revision 6