Projects
openEuler:24.03:SP1:Everything
gcc
Sign Up
Log In
Username
Password
We truncated the diff of some files because they were too big. If you want to see the full diff for every file,
click here
.
Overview
Repositories
Revisions
Requests
Users
Attributes
Meta
Expand all
Collapse all
Changes of Revision 5
View file
_service:tar_scm:gcc.spec
Changed
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ %global gcc_major 12 # Note, gcc_release must be integer, if you want to add suffixes to # %%{release}, append them after %%{gcc_release} on Release: line. -%global gcc_release 31 +%global gcc_release 32 %global _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 %global _performance_build 1 @@ -206,6 +206,27 @@ Patch94: 0094-BUGFIX-AutoBOLT-function-miss-bind-type.patch Patch95: 0095-STABS-remove-gstabs-and-gxcoff-functionality.patch Patch96: 0096-Bugfix-Autofdo-use-PMU-sampling-set-num-eauals-den.patch +Patch97: 0097-aarch64-Use-local-frame-vars-in-shrink-wrapping-code.patch +Patch98: 0098-aarch64-Avoid-a-use-of-callee-offset.patch +Patch99: 0099-aarch64-Explicitly-handle-frames-with-no-saved-registers.patch +Patch100: 0100-aarch64-Add-bytes-below-saved-regs-to-frame-info.patch +Patch101: 0101-aarch64-Add-bytes-below-hard-fp-to-frame-info.patch +Patch102: 0102-aarch64-Tweak-aarch64-save-restore-callee-saves.patch +Patch103: 0103-aarch64-Only-calculate-chain-offset-if-there-is-a-chain.patch +Patch104: 0104-aarch64-Rename-locals-offset-to-bytes-above-locals.patch +Patch105: 0105-aarch64-Rename-hard-fp-offset-to-bytes-above-hard-fp.patch +Patch106: 0106-aarch64-Tweak-frame-size-comment.patch +Patch107: 0107-aarch64-Measure-reg-offset-from-the-bottom-of-the-frame.patch +Patch108: 0108-aarch64-Simplify-top-of-frame-allocation.patch +Patch109: 0109-aarch64-Minor-initial-adjustment-tweak.patch +Patch110: 0110-aarch64-Tweak-stack-clash-boundary-condition.patch +Patch111: 0111-aarch64-Put-LR-save-probe-in-first-16-bytes.patch +Patch112: 0112-aarch64-Simplify-probe-of-final-frame-allocation.patch +Patch113: 0113-aarch64-Explicitly-record-probe-registers-in-frame-info.patch +Patch114: 0114-aarch64-Remove-below-hard-fp-saved-regs-size.patch +Patch115: 0115-aarch64-Make-stack-smash-canary-protect-saved-registers.patch +Patch116: 0116-aarch64-Fix-return-register-handling-in-untyped_call.patch +Patch117: 0117-aarch64-Fix-loose-ldpstp-check.patch # Part 3000 ~ 4999 %ifarch loongarch64 @@ -873,6 +894,27 @@ %patch94 -p1 %patch95 -p1 %patch96 -p1 +%patch97 -p1 +%patch98 -p1 +%patch99 -p1 +%patch100 -p1 +%patch101 -p1 +%patch102 -p1 +%patch103 -p1 +%patch104 -p1 +%patch105 -p1 +%patch106 -p1 +%patch107 -p1 +%patch108 -p1 +%patch109 -p1 +%patch110 -p1 +%patch111 -p1 +%patch112 -p1 +%patch113 -p1 +%patch114 -p1 +%patch115 -p1 +%patch116 -p1 +%patch117 -p1 %ifarch loongarch64 %patch3001 -p1 @@ -3268,6 +3310,12 @@ %doc rpm.doc/changelogs/libcc1/ChangeLog* %changelog +* Fri Sep 20 2024 fuanan <fuanan3@h-partners.com> - 12.3.1-32 +- Type:Sync +- ID:NA +- SUG:NA +- DESC:Sync patch for CVE-2023-4039 + * Thu Jul 11 2024 huyubiao <huyubiao@huawei.com> - 12.3.1-31 - Type:SPEC - ID:NA
View file
_service:tar_scm:0097-aarch64-Use-local-frame-vars-in-shrink-wrapping-code.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@ +From 62fbb215cc817e9f2c1ca80282a64f4ee30806bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:48 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Use local frame vars in shrink-wrapping code + +aarch64_layout_frame uses a shorthand for referring to +cfun->machine->frame: + + aarch64_frame &frame = cfun->machine->frame; + +This patch does the same for some other heavy users of the structure. +No functional change intended. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_save_callee_saves): Use + a local shorthand for cfun->machine->frame. + (aarch64_restore_callee_saves, aarch64_get_separate_components): + (aarch64_process_components): Likewise. + (aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space): Likewise. + (aarch64_expand_prologue, aarch64_expand_epilogue): Likewise. + (aarch64_layout_frame): Use existing shorthand for one more case. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 123 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- + 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 226dc9dffd47..ae42ffdedbeb 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8351,7 +8351,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + frame.is_scs_enabled + = (!crtl->calls_eh_return + && sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK) +- && known_ge (cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetLR_REGNUM, 0)); ++ && known_ge (frame.reg_offsetLR_REGNUM, 0)); + + /* When shadow call stack is enabled, the scs_pop in the epilogue will + restore x30, and we don't need to pop x30 again in the traditional +@@ -8763,6 +8763,7 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, + unsigned start, unsigned limit, bool skip_wb, + bool hard_fp_valid_p) + { ++ aarch64_frame &frame = cfun->machine->frame; + rtx_insn *insn; + unsigned regno; + unsigned regno2; +@@ -8777,8 +8778,8 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, + bool frame_related_p = aarch64_emit_cfi_for_reg_p (regno); + + if (skip_wb +- && (regno == cfun->machine->frame.wb_push_candidate1 +- || regno == cfun->machine->frame.wb_push_candidate2)) ++ && (regno == frame.wb_push_candidate1 ++ || regno == frame.wb_push_candidate2)) + continue; + + if (cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separatelyregno) +@@ -8786,7 +8787,7 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, + + machine_mode mode = aarch64_reg_save_mode (regno); + reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno); +- offset = start_offset + cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno; ++ offset = start_offset + frame.reg_offsetregno; + rtx base_rtx = stack_pointer_rtx; + poly_int64 sp_offset = offset; + +@@ -8799,7 +8800,7 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, + { + gcc_assert (known_eq (start_offset, 0)); + poly_int64 fp_offset +- = cfun->machine->frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + if (hard_fp_valid_p) + base_rtx = hard_frame_pointer_rtx; + else +@@ -8821,8 +8822,7 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, + && (regno2 = aarch64_next_callee_save (regno + 1, limit)) <= limit + && !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separatelyregno2 + && known_eq (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), +- cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno2 +- - cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno)) ++ frame.reg_offsetregno2 - frame.reg_offsetregno)) + { + rtx reg2 = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno2); + rtx mem2; +@@ -8872,6 +8872,7 @@ static void + aarch64_restore_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, unsigned start, + unsigned limit, bool skip_wb, rtx *cfi_ops) + { ++ aarch64_frame &frame = cfun->machine->frame; + unsigned regno; + unsigned regno2; + poly_int64 offset; +@@ -8888,13 +8889,13 @@ aarch64_restore_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, unsigned start, + rtx reg, mem; + + if (skip_wb +- && (regno == cfun->machine->frame.wb_pop_candidate1 +- || regno == cfun->machine->frame.wb_pop_candidate2)) ++ && (regno == frame.wb_pop_candidate1 ++ || regno == frame.wb_pop_candidate2)) + continue; + + machine_mode mode = aarch64_reg_save_mode (regno); + reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno); +- offset = start_offset + cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno; ++ offset = start_offset + frame.reg_offsetregno; + rtx base_rtx = stack_pointer_rtx; + if (mode == VNx2DImode && BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN) + aarch64_adjust_sve_callee_save_base (mode, base_rtx, anchor_reg, +@@ -8905,8 +8906,7 @@ aarch64_restore_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, unsigned start, + && (regno2 = aarch64_next_callee_save (regno + 1, limit)) <= limit + && !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separatelyregno2 + && known_eq (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), +- cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno2 +- - cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno)) ++ frame.reg_offsetregno2 - frame.reg_offsetregno)) + { + rtx reg2 = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno2); + rtx mem2; +@@ -9011,6 +9011,7 @@ offset_12bit_unsigned_scaled_p (machine_mode mode, poly_int64 offset) + static sbitmap + aarch64_get_separate_components (void) + { ++ aarch64_frame &frame = cfun->machine->frame; + sbitmap components = sbitmap_alloc (LAST_SAVED_REGNUM + 1); + bitmap_clear (components); + +@@ -9027,18 +9028,18 @@ aarch64_get_separate_components (void) + if (mode == VNx2DImode && BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN) + continue; + +- poly_int64 offset = cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno; ++ poly_int64 offset = frame.reg_offsetregno; + + /* If the register is saved in the first SVE save slot, we use + it as a stack probe for -fstack-clash-protection. */ + if (flag_stack_clash_protection +- && maybe_ne (cfun->machine->frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0) ++ && maybe_ne (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0) + && known_eq (offset, 0)) + continue; + + /* Get the offset relative to the register we'll use. */ + if (frame_pointer_needed) +- offset -= cfun->machine->frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ offset -= frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + else + offset += crtl->outgoing_args_size; + +@@ -9057,11 +9058,11 @@ aarch64_get_separate_components (void) + /* If the spare predicate register used by big-endian SVE code + is call-preserved, it must be saved in the main prologue + before any saves that use it. */ +- if (cfun->machine->frame.spare_pred_reg != INVALID_REGNUM) +- bitmap_clear_bit (components, cfun->machine->frame.spare_pred_reg); ++ if (frame.spare_pred_reg != INVALID_REGNUM) ++ bitmap_clear_bit (components, frame.spare_pred_reg); + +- unsigned reg1 = cfun->machine->frame.wb_push_candidate1; +- unsigned reg2 = cfun->machine->frame.wb_push_candidate2; ++ unsigned reg1 = frame.wb_push_candidate1; ++ unsigned reg2 = frame.wb_push_candidate2; + /* If registers have been chosen to be stored/restored with + writeback don't interfere with them to avoid having to output explicit + stack adjustment instructions. */ +@@ -9170,6 +9171,7 @@ aarch64_get_next_set_bit (sbitmap bmp, unsigned int start) + static void + aarch64_process_components (sbitmap components, bool prologue_p) + { ++ aarch64_frame &frame = cfun->machine->frame; + rtx ptr_reg = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, frame_pointer_needed + ? HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM + : STACK_POINTER_REGNUM); +@@ -9184,9 +9186,9 @@ aarch64_process_components (sbitmap components, bool prologue_p) + machine_mode mode = aarch64_reg_save_mode (regno); + + rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno); +- poly_int64 offset = cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno; ++ poly_int64 offset = frame.reg_offsetregno; + if (frame_pointer_needed) +- offset -= cfun->machine->frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ offset -= frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + else + offset += crtl->outgoing_args_size; + +@@ -9211,14 +9213,14 @@ aarch64_process_components (sbitmap components, bool prologue_p) + break; + } + +- poly_int64 offset2 = cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno2; ++ poly_int64 offset2 = frame.reg_offsetregno2; + /* The next register is not of the same class or its offset is not + mergeable with the current one into a pair. */ + if (aarch64_sve_mode_p (mode) + || !satisfies_constraint_Ump (mem) + || GP_REGNUM_P (regno) != GP_REGNUM_P (regno2) + || (crtl->abi->id () == ARM_PCS_SIMD && FP_REGNUM_P (regno)) +- || maybe_ne ((offset2 - cfun->machine->frame.reg_offsetregno),
View file
_service:tar_scm:0098-aarch64-Avoid-a-use-of-callee-offset.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +From 12a8889de169f892d2e927584c00d20b8b7e456f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:49 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Avoid a use of callee_offset + +When we emit the frame chain, i.e. when we reach Here in this statement +of aarch64_expand_prologue: + + if (emit_frame_chain) + { + // Here + ... + } + +the stack is in one of two states: + +- We've allocated up to the frame chain, but no more. + +- We've allocated the whole frame, and the frame chain is within easy + reach of the new SP. + +The offset of the frame chain from the current SP is available +in aarch64_frame as callee_offset. It is also available as the +chain_offset local variable, where the latter is calculated from other +data. (However, chain_offset is not always equal to callee_offset when +!emit_frame_chain, so chain_offset isn't redundant.) + +In c600df9a4060da3c6121ff4d0b93f179eafd69d1 I switched to using +chain_offset for the initialisation of the hard frame pointer: + + aarch64_add_offset (Pmode, hard_frame_pointer_rtx, +- stack_pointer_rtx, callee_offset, ++ stack_pointer_rtx, chain_offset, + tmp1_rtx, tmp0_rtx, frame_pointer_needed); + +But the later REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA handling still used callee_offset. + +I think the difference is harmless, but it's more logical for the +CFA note to be in sync, and it's more convenient for later patches +if it uses chain_offset. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_expand_prologue): Use + chain_offset rather than callee_offset. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 4 +--- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index ae42ffdedbeb..79253322fd7c 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -9670,7 +9670,6 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + poly_int64 initial_adjust = frame.initial_adjust; + HOST_WIDE_INT callee_adjust = frame.callee_adjust; + poly_int64 final_adjust = frame.final_adjust; +- poly_int64 callee_offset = frame.callee_offset; + poly_int64 sve_callee_adjust = frame.sve_callee_adjust; + poly_int64 below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size + = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; +@@ -9783,8 +9782,7 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + implicit. */ + if (!find_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA, NULL_RTX)) + { +- rtx src = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, +- callee_offset); ++ rtx src = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, chain_offset); + add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA, + gen_rtx_SET (hard_frame_pointer_rtx, src)); + } +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0099-aarch64-Explicitly-handle-frames-with-no-saved-registers.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +From 03d5e89e7f3be53fd7142556e8e0a2774c653dca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:49 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Explicitly handle frames with no saved registers + +If a frame has no saved registers, it can be allocated in one go. +There is no need to treat the areas below and above the saved +registers as separate. + +And if we allocate the frame in one go, it should be allocated +as the initial_adjust rather than the final_adjust. This allows the +frame size to grow to guard_size - guard_used_by_caller before a stack +probe is needed. (A frame with no register saves is necessarily a +leaf frame.) + +This is a no-op as thing stand, since a leaf function will have +no outgoing arguments, and so all the frame will be above where +the saved registers normally go. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Explicitly + allocate the frame in one go if there are no saved registers. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 +++++--- + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 79253322fd7c..e1f21230c15e 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8378,9 +8378,11 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + HOST_WIDE_INT const_size, const_outgoing_args_size, const_fp_offset; + HOST_WIDE_INT const_saved_regs_size; +- if (frame.frame_size.is_constant (&const_size) +- && const_size < max_push_offset +- && known_eq (frame.hard_fp_offset, const_size)) ++ if (known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, 0)) ++ frame.initial_adjust = frame.frame_size; ++ else if (frame.frame_size.is_constant (&const_size) ++ && const_size < max_push_offset ++ && known_eq (frame.hard_fp_offset, const_size)) + { + /* Simple, small frame with no outgoing arguments: + +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0100-aarch64-Add-bytes-below-saved-regs-to-frame-info.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ +From 49c2eb7616756c323b7f6b18d8616ec945eb1263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:49 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Add bytes_below_saved_regs to frame info + +The frame layout code currently hard-codes the assumption that +the number of bytes below the saved registers is equal to the +size of the outgoing arguments. This patch abstracts that +value into a new field of aarch64_frame. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame::bytes_below_saved_regs): New + field. + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Initialize it, + and use it instead of crtl->outgoing_args_size. + (aarch64_get_separate_components): Use bytes_below_saved_regs instead + of outgoing_args_size. + (aarch64_process_components): Likewise. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 71 ++++++++++++++++++----------------- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 5 +++ + 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index e1f21230c15e..94e1b6865849 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8217,6 +8217,8 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + gcc_assert (crtl->is_leaf + || maybe_ne (frame.reg_offsetR30_REGNUM, SLOT_NOT_REQUIRED)); + ++ frame.bytes_below_saved_regs = crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ + /* Now assign stack slots for the registers. Start with the predicate + registers, since predicate LDR and STR have a relatively small + offset range. These saves happen below the hard frame pointer. */ +@@ -8321,18 +8323,18 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + poly_int64 varargs_and_saved_regs_size = offset + frame.saved_varargs_size; + +- poly_int64 above_outgoing_args ++ poly_int64 saved_regs_and_above + = aligned_upper_bound (varargs_and_saved_regs_size + + get_frame_size (), + STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); + + frame.hard_fp_offset +- = above_outgoing_args - frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ = saved_regs_and_above - frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + + /* Both these values are already aligned. */ +- gcc_assert (multiple_p (crtl->outgoing_args_size, ++ gcc_assert (multiple_p (frame.bytes_below_saved_regs, + STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT)); +- frame.frame_size = above_outgoing_args + crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ frame.frame_size = saved_regs_and_above + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + + frame.locals_offset = frame.saved_varargs_size; + +@@ -8376,7 +8378,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + else if (frame.wb_pop_candidate1 != INVALID_REGNUM) + max_push_offset = 256; + +- HOST_WIDE_INT const_size, const_outgoing_args_size, const_fp_offset; ++ HOST_WIDE_INT const_size, const_below_saved_regs, const_fp_offset; + HOST_WIDE_INT const_saved_regs_size; + if (known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, 0)) + frame.initial_adjust = frame.frame_size; +@@ -8384,31 +8386,31 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + && const_size < max_push_offset + && known_eq (frame.hard_fp_offset, const_size)) + { +- /* Simple, small frame with no outgoing arguments: ++ /* Simple, small frame with no data below the saved registers. + + stp reg1, reg2, sp, -frame_size! + stp reg3, reg4, sp, 16 */ + frame.callee_adjust = const_size; + } +- else if (crtl->outgoing_args_size.is_constant (&const_outgoing_args_size) ++ else if (frame.bytes_below_saved_regs.is_constant (&const_below_saved_regs) + && frame.saved_regs_size.is_constant (&const_saved_regs_size) +- && const_outgoing_args_size + const_saved_regs_size < 512 +- /* We could handle this case even with outgoing args, provided +- that the number of args left us with valid offsets for all +- predicate and vector save slots. It's such a rare case that +- it hardly seems worth the effort though. */ +- && (!saves_below_hard_fp_p || const_outgoing_args_size == 0) ++ && const_below_saved_regs + const_saved_regs_size < 512 ++ /* We could handle this case even with data below the saved ++ registers, provided that that data left us with valid offsets ++ for all predicate and vector save slots. It's such a rare ++ case that it hardly seems worth the effort though. */ ++ && (!saves_below_hard_fp_p || const_below_saved_regs == 0) + && !(cfun->calls_alloca + && frame.hard_fp_offset.is_constant (&const_fp_offset) + && const_fp_offset < max_push_offset)) + { +- /* Frame with small outgoing arguments: ++ /* Frame with small area below the saved registers: + + sub sp, sp, frame_size +- stp reg1, reg2, sp, outgoing_args_size +- stp reg3, reg4, sp, outgoing_args_size + 16 */ ++ stp reg1, reg2, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs ++ stp reg3, reg4, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs + 16 */ + frame.initial_adjust = frame.frame_size; +- frame.callee_offset = const_outgoing_args_size; ++ frame.callee_offset = const_below_saved_regs; + } + else if (saves_below_hard_fp_p + && known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, +@@ -8418,30 +8420,29 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + sub sp, sp, hard_fp_offset + below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size + save SVE registers relative to SP +- sub sp, sp, outgoing_args_size */ ++ sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ + frame.initial_adjust = (frame.hard_fp_offset + + frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size); +- frame.final_adjust = crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } + else if (frame.hard_fp_offset.is_constant (&const_fp_offset) + && const_fp_offset < max_push_offset) + { +- /* Frame with large outgoing arguments or SVE saves, but with +- a small local area: ++ /* Frame with large area below the saved registers, or with SVE saves, ++ but with a small area above: + + stp reg1, reg2, sp, -hard_fp_offset! + stp reg3, reg4, sp, 16 + sub sp, sp, below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size + save SVE registers relative to SP +- sub sp, sp, outgoing_args_size */ ++ sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ + frame.callee_adjust = const_fp_offset; + frame.sve_callee_adjust = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; +- frame.final_adjust = crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } + else + { +- /* Frame with large local area and outgoing arguments or SVE saves, +- using frame pointer: ++ /* General case: + + sub sp, sp, hard_fp_offset + stp x29, x30, sp, 0 +@@ -8449,10 +8450,10 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + stp reg3, reg4, sp, 16 + sub sp, sp, below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size + save SVE registers relative to SP +- sub sp, sp, outgoing_args_size */ ++ sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ + frame.initial_adjust = frame.hard_fp_offset; + frame.sve_callee_adjust = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; +- frame.final_adjust = crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } + + /* Make sure the individual adjustments add up to the full frame size. */ +@@ -9043,7 +9044,7 @@ aarch64_get_separate_components (void) + if (frame_pointer_needed) + offset -= frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + else +- offset += crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ offset += frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + + /* Check that we can access the stack slot of the register with one + direct load with no adjustments needed. */ +@@ -9192,7 +9193,7 @@ aarch64_process_components (sbitmap components, bool prologue_p) + if (frame_pointer_needed) + offset -= frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + else +- offset += crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ offset += frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + + rtx addr = plus_constant (Pmode, ptr_reg, offset); + rtx mem = gen_frame_mem (mode, addr); +@@ -9246,7 +9247,7 @@ aarch64_process_components (sbitmap components, bool prologue_p) + if (frame_pointer_needed) + offset2 -= frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + else +- offset2 += crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ offset2 += frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + rtx addr2 = plus_constant (Pmode, ptr_reg, offset2); + rtx mem2 = gen_frame_mem (mode, addr2); + rtx set2 = prologue_p ? gen_rtx_SET (mem2, reg2) +@@ -9320,10 +9321,10 @@ aarch64_stack_clash_protection_alloca_probe_range (void) + registers. If POLY_SIZE is not large enough to require a probe this function + will only adjust the stack. When allocating the stack space + FRAME_RELATED_P is then used to indicate if the allocation is frame related. +- FINAL_ADJUSTMENT_P indicates whether we are allocating the outgoing +- arguments. If we are then we ensure that any allocation larger than the ABI +- defined buffer needs a probe so that the invariant of having a 1KB buffer is +- maintained. ++ FINAL_ADJUSTMENT_P indicates whether we are allocating the area below
View file
_service:tar_scm:0101-aarch64-Add-bytes-below-hard-fp-to-frame-info.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +From 34081079ea4de0c98331843f574b5f6f94d7b234 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:50 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Add bytes_below_hard_fp to frame info + +Following on from the previous bytes_below_saved_regs patch, this one +records the number of bytes that are below the hard frame pointer. +This eventually replaces below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size. + +If a frame pointer is not needed, the epilogue adds final_adjust +to the stack pointer before restoring registers: + + aarch64_add_sp (tmp1_rtx, tmp0_rtx, final_adjust, true); + +Therefore, if the epilogue needs to restore the stack pointer from +the hard frame pointer, the directly corresponding offset is: + + -bytes_below_hard_fp + final_adjust + +i.e. go from the hard frame pointer to the bottom of the frame, +then add the same amount as if we were using the stack pointer +from the outset. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame::bytes_below_hard_fp): New + field. + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Initialize it. + (aarch64_expand_epilogue): Use it instead of + below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 6 +++--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 5 +++++ + 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 94e1b6865849..c7d84245fbfc 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8269,6 +8269,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + of the callee save area. */ + bool saves_below_hard_fp_p = maybe_ne (offset, 0); + frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size = offset; ++ frame.bytes_below_hard_fp = offset + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + if (frame.emit_frame_chain) + { + /* FP and LR are placed in the linkage record. */ +@@ -9856,8 +9857,7 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall) + poly_int64 final_adjust = frame.final_adjust; + poly_int64 callee_offset = frame.callee_offset; + poly_int64 sve_callee_adjust = frame.sve_callee_adjust; +- poly_int64 below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size +- = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ poly_int64 bytes_below_hard_fp = frame.bytes_below_hard_fp; + unsigned reg1 = frame.wb_pop_candidate1; + unsigned reg2 = frame.wb_pop_candidate2; + unsigned int last_gpr = (frame.is_scs_enabled +@@ -9915,7 +9915,7 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall) + is restored on the instruction doing the writeback. */ + aarch64_add_offset (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, + hard_frame_pointer_rtx, +- -callee_offset - below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, ++ -bytes_below_hard_fp + final_adjust, + tmp1_rtx, tmp0_rtx, callee_adjust == 0); + else + /* The case where we need to re-use the register here is very rare, so +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +index 1e105e12db8d..de68ff7202fc 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +@@ -880,6 +880,11 @@ struct GTY (()) aarch64_frame + are saved below the hard frame pointer. */ + poly_int64 below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + ++ /* The number of bytes between the bottom of the static frame (the bottom ++ of the outgoing arguments) and the hard frame pointer. This value is ++ always a multiple of STACK_BOUNDARY. */ ++ poly_int64 bytes_below_hard_fp; ++ + /* Offset from the base of the frame (incomming SP) to the + top of the locals area. This value is always a multiple of + STACK_BOUNDARY. */ +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0102-aarch64-Tweak-aarch64-save-restore-callee-saves.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ +From 187861af7c51db9eddc6f954b589c121b210fc74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:50 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Tweak aarch64_save/restore_callee_saves + +aarch64_save_callee_saves and aarch64_restore_callee_saves took +a parameter called start_offset that gives the offset of the +bottom of the saved register area from the current stack pointer. +However, it's more convenient for later patches if we use the +bottom of the entire frame as the reference point, rather than +the bottom of the saved registers. + +Doing that removes the need for the callee_offset field. +Other than that, this is not a win on its own. It only really +makes sense in combination with the follow-on patches. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame::callee_offset): Delete. + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Remove + callee_offset handling. + (aarch64_save_callee_saves): Replace the start_offset parameter + with a bytes_below_sp parameter. + (aarch64_restore_callee_saves): Likewise. + (aarch64_expand_prologue): Update accordingly. + (aarch64_expand_epilogue): Likewise. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 56 +++++++++++++++++------------------ + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 4 --- + 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index c7d84245fbfc..e79551af41df 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8343,7 +8343,6 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + frame.final_adjust = 0; + frame.callee_adjust = 0; + frame.sve_callee_adjust = 0; +- frame.callee_offset = 0; + + frame.wb_pop_candidate1 = frame.wb_push_candidate1; + frame.wb_pop_candidate2 = frame.wb_push_candidate2; +@@ -8411,7 +8410,6 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + stp reg1, reg2, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs + stp reg3, reg4, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs + 16 */ + frame.initial_adjust = frame.frame_size; +- frame.callee_offset = const_below_saved_regs; + } + else if (saves_below_hard_fp_p + && known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, +@@ -8758,12 +8756,13 @@ aarch64_add_cfa_expression (rtx_insn *insn, rtx reg, + } + + /* Emit code to save the callee-saved registers from register number START +- to LIMIT to the stack at the location starting at offset START_OFFSET, +- skipping any write-back candidates if SKIP_WB is true. HARD_FP_VALID_P +- is true if the hard frame pointer has been set up. */ ++ to LIMIT to the stack. The stack pointer is currently BYTES_BELOW_SP ++ bytes above the bottom of the static frame. Skip any write-back ++ candidates if SKIP_WB is true. HARD_FP_VALID_P is true if the hard ++ frame pointer has been set up. */ + + static void +-aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, ++aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 bytes_below_sp, + unsigned start, unsigned limit, bool skip_wb, + bool hard_fp_valid_p) + { +@@ -8791,7 +8790,9 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, + + machine_mode mode = aarch64_reg_save_mode (regno); + reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno); +- offset = start_offset + frame.reg_offsetregno; ++ offset = (frame.reg_offsetregno ++ + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs ++ - bytes_below_sp); + rtx base_rtx = stack_pointer_rtx; + poly_int64 sp_offset = offset; + +@@ -8802,9 +8803,7 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, + else if (GP_REGNUM_P (regno) + && (!offset.is_constant (&const_offset) || const_offset >= 512)) + { +- gcc_assert (known_eq (start_offset, 0)); +- poly_int64 fp_offset +- = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ poly_int64 fp_offset = frame.bytes_below_hard_fp - bytes_below_sp; + if (hard_fp_valid_p) + base_rtx = hard_frame_pointer_rtx; + else +@@ -8868,12 +8867,13 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, + } + + /* Emit code to restore the callee registers from register number START +- up to and including LIMIT. Restore from the stack offset START_OFFSET, +- skipping any write-back candidates if SKIP_WB is true. Write the +- appropriate REG_CFA_RESTORE notes into CFI_OPS. */ ++ up to and including LIMIT. The stack pointer is currently BYTES_BELOW_SP ++ bytes above the bottom of the static frame. Skip any write-back ++ candidates if SKIP_WB is true. Write the appropriate REG_CFA_RESTORE ++ notes into CFI_OPS. */ + + static void +-aarch64_restore_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, unsigned start, ++aarch64_restore_callee_saves (poly_int64 bytes_below_sp, unsigned start, + unsigned limit, bool skip_wb, rtx *cfi_ops) + { + aarch64_frame &frame = cfun->machine->frame; +@@ -8899,7 +8899,9 @@ aarch64_restore_callee_saves (poly_int64 start_offset, unsigned start, + + machine_mode mode = aarch64_reg_save_mode (regno); + reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno); +- offset = start_offset + frame.reg_offsetregno; ++ offset = (frame.reg_offsetregno ++ + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs ++ - bytes_below_sp); + rtx base_rtx = stack_pointer_rtx; + if (mode == VNx2DImode && BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN) + aarch64_adjust_sve_callee_save_base (mode, base_rtx, anchor_reg, +@@ -9675,8 +9677,6 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + HOST_WIDE_INT callee_adjust = frame.callee_adjust; + poly_int64 final_adjust = frame.final_adjust; + poly_int64 sve_callee_adjust = frame.sve_callee_adjust; +- poly_int64 below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size +- = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + unsigned reg1 = frame.wb_push_candidate1; + unsigned reg2 = frame.wb_push_candidate2; + bool emit_frame_chain = frame.emit_frame_chain; +@@ -9752,8 +9752,8 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + - frame.hard_fp_offset); + gcc_assert (known_ge (chain_offset, 0)); + +- /* The offset of the bottom of the save area from the current SP. */ +- poly_int64 saved_regs_offset = chain_offset - below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ /* The offset of the current SP from the bottom of the static frame. */ ++ poly_int64 bytes_below_sp = frame_size - initial_adjust - callee_adjust; + + if (emit_frame_chain) + { +@@ -9761,7 +9761,7 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + { + reg1 = R29_REGNUM; + reg2 = R30_REGNUM; +- aarch64_save_callee_saves (saved_regs_offset, reg1, reg2, ++ aarch64_save_callee_saves (bytes_below_sp, reg1, reg2, + false, false); + } + else +@@ -9801,7 +9801,7 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + emit_insn (gen_stack_tie (stack_pointer_rtx, hard_frame_pointer_rtx)); + } + +- aarch64_save_callee_saves (saved_regs_offset, R0_REGNUM, R30_REGNUM, ++ aarch64_save_callee_saves (bytes_below_sp, R0_REGNUM, R30_REGNUM, + callee_adjust != 0 || emit_frame_chain, + emit_frame_chain); + if (maybe_ne (sve_callee_adjust, 0)) +@@ -9811,16 +9811,17 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (tmp1_rtx, tmp0_rtx, + sve_callee_adjust, + !frame_pointer_needed, false); +- saved_regs_offset += sve_callee_adjust; ++ bytes_below_sp -= sve_callee_adjust; + } +- aarch64_save_callee_saves (saved_regs_offset, P0_REGNUM, P15_REGNUM, ++ aarch64_save_callee_saves (bytes_below_sp, P0_REGNUM, P15_REGNUM, + false, emit_frame_chain); +- aarch64_save_callee_saves (saved_regs_offset, V0_REGNUM, V31_REGNUM, ++ aarch64_save_callee_saves (bytes_below_sp, V0_REGNUM, V31_REGNUM, + callee_adjust != 0 || emit_frame_chain, + emit_frame_chain); + + /* We may need to probe the final adjustment if it is larger than the guard + that is assumed by the called. */ ++ gcc_assert (known_eq (bytes_below_sp, final_adjust)); + aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (tmp1_rtx, tmp0_rtx, final_adjust, + !frame_pointer_needed, true); + } +@@ -9855,7 +9856,6 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall) + poly_int64 initial_adjust = frame.initial_adjust; + HOST_WIDE_INT callee_adjust = frame.callee_adjust; + poly_int64 final_adjust = frame.final_adjust; +- poly_int64 callee_offset = frame.callee_offset; + poly_int64 sve_callee_adjust = frame.sve_callee_adjust; + poly_int64 bytes_below_hard_fp = frame.bytes_below_hard_fp; + unsigned reg1 = frame.wb_pop_candidate1; +@@ -9925,9 +9925,9 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall) + + /* Restore the vector registers before the predicate registers, + so that we can use P4 as a temporary for big-endian SVE frames. */ +- aarch64_restore_callee_saves (callee_offset, V0_REGNUM, V31_REGNUM, ++ aarch64_restore_callee_saves (final_adjust, V0_REGNUM, V31_REGNUM, + callee_adjust != 0, &cfi_ops); +- aarch64_restore_callee_saves (callee_offset, P0_REGNUM, P15_REGNUM, ++ aarch64_restore_callee_saves (final_adjust, P0_REGNUM, P15_REGNUM, + false, &cfi_ops); + if (maybe_ne (sve_callee_adjust, 0)) + aarch64_add_sp (NULL_RTX, NULL_RTX, sve_callee_adjust, true); +@@ -9935,7 +9935,7 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall)
View file
_service:tar_scm:0103-aarch64-Only-calculate-chain-offset-if-there-is-a-chain.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +From 2b983f9064d808daf909bde1d4a13980934a7e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:51 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Only calculate chain_offset if there is a chain + +After previous patches, it is no longer necessary to calculate +a chain_offset in cases where there is no chain record. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_expand_prologue): Move the + calculation of chain_offset into the emit_frame_chain block. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 10 +++++----- + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index e79551af41df..d71a042d6112 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -9747,16 +9747,16 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + if (callee_adjust != 0) + aarch64_push_regs (reg1, reg2, callee_adjust); + +- /* The offset of the frame chain record (if any) from the current SP. */ +- poly_int64 chain_offset = (initial_adjust + callee_adjust +- - frame.hard_fp_offset); +- gcc_assert (known_ge (chain_offset, 0)); +- + /* The offset of the current SP from the bottom of the static frame. */ + poly_int64 bytes_below_sp = frame_size - initial_adjust - callee_adjust; + + if (emit_frame_chain) + { ++ /* The offset of the frame chain record (if any) from the current SP. */ ++ poly_int64 chain_offset = (initial_adjust + callee_adjust ++ - frame.hard_fp_offset); ++ gcc_assert (known_ge (chain_offset, 0)); ++ + if (callee_adjust == 0) + { + reg1 = R29_REGNUM; +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0104-aarch64-Rename-locals-offset-to-bytes-above-locals.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +From 0a0a824808d1dec51004fb5805c1a0ae2a35433f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:51 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Rename locals_offset to bytes_above_locals +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +locals_offset was described as: + + /* Offset from the base of the frame (incomming SP) to the + top of the locals area. This value is always a multiple of + STACK_BOUNDARY. */ + +This is implicitly an âupside downâ view of the frame: the incoming +SP is at offset 0, and anything N bytes below the incoming SP is at +offset N (rather than -N). + +However, reg_offset instead uses a âright way upâ view; that is, +it views offsets in address terms. Something above X is at a +positive offset from X and something below X is at a negative +offset from X. + +Also, even on FRAME_GROWS_DOWNWARD targets like AArch64, +target-independent code views offsets in address terms too: +locals are allocated at negative offsets to virtual_stack_vars. + +It seems confusing to have *_offset fields of the same structure +using different polarities like this. This patch tries to avoid +that by renaming locals_offset to bytes_above_locals. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame::locals_offset): Rename to... + (aarch64_frame::bytes_above_locals): ...this. + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame) + (aarch64_initial_elimination_offset): Update accordingly. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 6 +++--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 6 +++--- + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index d71a042d6112..d4ec352ba98a 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8337,7 +8337,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT)); + frame.frame_size = saved_regs_and_above + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + +- frame.locals_offset = frame.saved_varargs_size; ++ frame.bytes_above_locals = frame.saved_varargs_size; + + frame.initial_adjust = 0; + frame.final_adjust = 0; +@@ -12578,13 +12578,13 @@ aarch64_initial_elimination_offset (unsigned from, unsigned to) + return frame.hard_fp_offset; + + if (from == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM) +- return frame.hard_fp_offset - frame.locals_offset; ++ return frame.hard_fp_offset - frame.bytes_above_locals; + } + + if (to == STACK_POINTER_REGNUM) + { + if (from == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM) +- return frame.frame_size - frame.locals_offset; ++ return frame.frame_size - frame.bytes_above_locals; + } + + return frame.frame_size; +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +index 94fca4b94716..bf46e6124aa9 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +@@ -885,10 +885,10 @@ struct GTY (()) aarch64_frame + always a multiple of STACK_BOUNDARY. */ + poly_int64 bytes_below_hard_fp; + +- /* Offset from the base of the frame (incomming SP) to the +- top of the locals area. This value is always a multiple of ++ /* The number of bytes between the top of the locals area and the top ++ of the frame (the incomming SP). This value is always a multiple of + STACK_BOUNDARY. */ +- poly_int64 locals_offset; ++ poly_int64 bytes_above_locals; + + /* Offset from the base of the frame (incomming SP) to the + hard_frame_pointer. This value is always a multiple of +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0105-aarch64-Rename-hard-fp-offset-to-bytes-above-hard-fp.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ +From 3fbf0789202b30a67b12e1fb785c7130f098d665 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:52 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Rename hard_fp_offset to bytes_above_hard_fp +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +Similarly to the previous locals_offset patch, hard_fp_offset +was described as: + + /* Offset from the base of the frame (incomming SP) to the + hard_frame_pointer. This value is always a multiple of + STACK_BOUNDARY. */ + poly_int64 hard_fp_offset; + +which again took an âupside-downâ view: higher offsets meant lower +addresses. This patch renames the field to bytes_above_hard_fp instead. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame::hard_fp_offset): Rename + to... + (aarch64_frame::bytes_above_hard_fp): ...this. + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame) + (aarch64_expand_prologue): Update accordingly. + (aarch64_initial_elimination_offset): Likewise. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 26 +++++++++++++------------- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 6 +++--- + 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index d4ec352ba98a..3c4052740e7a 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8329,7 +8329,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + get_frame_size (), + STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); + +- frame.hard_fp_offset ++ frame.bytes_above_hard_fp + = saved_regs_and_above - frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + + /* Both these values are already aligned. */ +@@ -8378,13 +8378,13 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + else if (frame.wb_pop_candidate1 != INVALID_REGNUM) + max_push_offset = 256; + +- HOST_WIDE_INT const_size, const_below_saved_regs, const_fp_offset; ++ HOST_WIDE_INT const_size, const_below_saved_regs, const_above_fp; + HOST_WIDE_INT const_saved_regs_size; + if (known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, 0)) + frame.initial_adjust = frame.frame_size; + else if (frame.frame_size.is_constant (&const_size) + && const_size < max_push_offset +- && known_eq (frame.hard_fp_offset, const_size)) ++ && known_eq (frame.bytes_above_hard_fp, const_size)) + { + /* Simple, small frame with no data below the saved registers. + +@@ -8401,8 +8401,8 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + case that it hardly seems worth the effort though. */ + && (!saves_below_hard_fp_p || const_below_saved_regs == 0) + && !(cfun->calls_alloca +- && frame.hard_fp_offset.is_constant (&const_fp_offset) +- && const_fp_offset < max_push_offset)) ++ && frame.bytes_above_hard_fp.is_constant (&const_above_fp) ++ && const_above_fp < max_push_offset)) + { + /* Frame with small area below the saved registers: + +@@ -8420,12 +8420,12 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + sub sp, sp, hard_fp_offset + below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size + save SVE registers relative to SP + sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ +- frame.initial_adjust = (frame.hard_fp_offset ++ frame.initial_adjust = (frame.bytes_above_hard_fp + + frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size); + frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } +- else if (frame.hard_fp_offset.is_constant (&const_fp_offset) +- && const_fp_offset < max_push_offset) ++ else if (frame.bytes_above_hard_fp.is_constant (&const_above_fp) ++ && const_above_fp < max_push_offset) + { + /* Frame with large area below the saved registers, or with SVE saves, + but with a small area above: +@@ -8435,7 +8435,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + sub sp, sp, below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size + save SVE registers relative to SP + sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ +- frame.callee_adjust = const_fp_offset; ++ frame.callee_adjust = const_above_fp; + frame.sve_callee_adjust = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } +@@ -8450,7 +8450,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + sub sp, sp, below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size + save SVE registers relative to SP + sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ +- frame.initial_adjust = frame.hard_fp_offset; ++ frame.initial_adjust = frame.bytes_above_hard_fp; + frame.sve_callee_adjust = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } +@@ -9754,7 +9754,7 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + { + /* The offset of the frame chain record (if any) from the current SP. */ + poly_int64 chain_offset = (initial_adjust + callee_adjust +- - frame.hard_fp_offset); ++ - frame.bytes_above_hard_fp); + gcc_assert (known_ge (chain_offset, 0)); + + if (callee_adjust == 0) +@@ -12575,10 +12575,10 @@ aarch64_initial_elimination_offset (unsigned from, unsigned to) + if (to == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM) + { + if (from == ARG_POINTER_REGNUM) +- return frame.hard_fp_offset; ++ return frame.bytes_above_hard_fp; + + if (from == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM) +- return frame.hard_fp_offset - frame.bytes_above_locals; ++ return frame.bytes_above_hard_fp - frame.bytes_above_locals; + } + + if (to == STACK_POINTER_REGNUM) +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +index bf46e6124aa9..dd1f403f9393 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +@@ -890,10 +890,10 @@ struct GTY (()) aarch64_frame + STACK_BOUNDARY. */ + poly_int64 bytes_above_locals; + +- /* Offset from the base of the frame (incomming SP) to the +- hard_frame_pointer. This value is always a multiple of ++ /* The number of bytes between the hard_frame_pointer and the top of ++ the frame (the incomming SP). This value is always a multiple of + STACK_BOUNDARY. */ +- poly_int64 hard_fp_offset; ++ poly_int64 bytes_above_hard_fp; + + /* The size of the frame. This value is the offset from base of the + frame (incomming SP) to the stack_pointer. This value is always +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0106-aarch64-Tweak-frame-size-comment.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +From aac8b31379ac3bbd14fc6427dce23f56e54e8485 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:52 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Tweak frame_size comment +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +This patch fixes another case in which a value was described with +an âupside-downâ view. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame::frame_size): Tweak comment. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 4 ++-- + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +index dd1f403f9393..700524ae22bf 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +@@ -895,8 +895,8 @@ struct GTY (()) aarch64_frame + STACK_BOUNDARY. */ + poly_int64 bytes_above_hard_fp; + +- /* The size of the frame. This value is the offset from base of the +- frame (incomming SP) to the stack_pointer. This value is always ++ /* The size of the frame, i.e. the number of bytes between the bottom ++ of the outgoing arguments and the incoming SP. This value is always + a multiple of STACK_BOUNDARY. */ + poly_int64 frame_size; + +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0107-aarch64-Measure-reg-offset-from-the-bottom-of-the-frame.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ +From 8d5506a8aeb8dd7e8b209a3663b07688478f76b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:53 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Measure reg_offset from the bottom of the frame + +reg_offset was measured from the bottom of the saved register area. +This made perfect sense with the original layout, since the bottom +of the saved register area was also the hard frame pointer address. +It became slightly less obvious with SVE, since we save SVE +registers below the hard frame pointer, but it still made sense. + +However, if we want to allow different frame layouts, it's more +convenient and obvious to measure reg_offset from the bottom of +the frame. After previous patches, it's also a slight simplification +in its own right. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame): Add comment above + reg_offset. + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Walk offsets + from the bottom of the frame, rather than the bottom of the saved + register area. Measure reg_offset from the bottom of the frame + rather than the bottom of the saved register area. + (aarch64_save_callee_saves): Update accordingly. + (aarch64_restore_callee_saves): Likewise. + (aarch64_get_separate_components): Likewise. + (aarch64_process_components): Likewise. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 53 ++++++++++++++++------------------- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 3 ++ + 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 3c4052740e7a..97dd077844b4 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8139,7 +8139,6 @@ aarch64_needs_frame_chain (void) + static void + aarch64_layout_frame (void) + { +- poly_int64 offset = 0; + int regno, last_fp_reg = INVALID_REGNUM; + machine_mode vector_save_mode = aarch64_reg_save_mode (V8_REGNUM); + poly_int64 vector_save_size = GET_MODE_SIZE (vector_save_mode); +@@ -8217,7 +8216,9 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + gcc_assert (crtl->is_leaf + || maybe_ne (frame.reg_offsetR30_REGNUM, SLOT_NOT_REQUIRED)); + +- frame.bytes_below_saved_regs = crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ poly_int64 offset = crtl->outgoing_args_size; ++ gcc_assert (multiple_p (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT)); ++ frame.bytes_below_saved_regs = offset; + + /* Now assign stack slots for the registers. Start with the predicate + registers, since predicate LDR and STR have a relatively small +@@ -8229,7 +8230,8 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + offset += BYTES_PER_SVE_PRED; + } + +- if (maybe_ne (offset, 0)) ++ poly_int64 saved_prs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ if (maybe_ne (saved_prs_size, 0)) + { + /* If we have any vector registers to save above the predicate registers, + the offset of the vector register save slots need to be a multiple +@@ -8247,10 +8249,10 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); + else + { +- if (known_le (offset, vector_save_size)) +- offset = vector_save_size; +- else if (known_le (offset, vector_save_size * 2)) +- offset = vector_save_size * 2; ++ if (known_le (saved_prs_size, vector_save_size)) ++ offset = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs + vector_save_size; ++ else if (known_le (saved_prs_size, vector_save_size * 2)) ++ offset = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs + vector_save_size * 2; + else + gcc_unreachable (); + } +@@ -8267,9 +8269,10 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + /* OFFSET is now the offset of the hard frame pointer from the bottom + of the callee save area. */ +- bool saves_below_hard_fp_p = maybe_ne (offset, 0); +- frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size = offset; +- frame.bytes_below_hard_fp = offset + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ bool saves_below_hard_fp_p ++ = maybe_ne (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0); ++ frame.bytes_below_hard_fp = offset; + if (frame.emit_frame_chain) + { + /* FP and LR are placed in the linkage record. */ +@@ -8320,9 +8323,10 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); + +- frame.saved_regs_size = offset; ++ frame.saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + +- poly_int64 varargs_and_saved_regs_size = offset + frame.saved_varargs_size; ++ poly_int64 varargs_and_saved_regs_size ++ = frame.saved_regs_size + frame.saved_varargs_size; + + poly_int64 saved_regs_and_above + = aligned_upper_bound (varargs_and_saved_regs_size +@@ -8790,9 +8794,7 @@ aarch64_save_callee_saves (poly_int64 bytes_below_sp, + + machine_mode mode = aarch64_reg_save_mode (regno); + reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno); +- offset = (frame.reg_offsetregno +- + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs +- - bytes_below_sp); ++ offset = frame.reg_offsetregno - bytes_below_sp; + rtx base_rtx = stack_pointer_rtx; + poly_int64 sp_offset = offset; + +@@ -8899,9 +8901,7 @@ aarch64_restore_callee_saves (poly_int64 bytes_below_sp, unsigned start, + + machine_mode mode = aarch64_reg_save_mode (regno); + reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno); +- offset = (frame.reg_offsetregno +- + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs +- - bytes_below_sp); ++ offset = frame.reg_offsetregno - bytes_below_sp; + rtx base_rtx = stack_pointer_rtx; + if (mode == VNx2DImode && BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN) + aarch64_adjust_sve_callee_save_base (mode, base_rtx, anchor_reg, +@@ -9040,14 +9040,12 @@ aarch64_get_separate_components (void) + it as a stack probe for -fstack-clash-protection. */ + if (flag_stack_clash_protection + && maybe_ne (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0) +- && known_eq (offset, 0)) ++ && known_eq (offset, frame.bytes_below_saved_regs)) + continue; + + /* Get the offset relative to the register we'll use. */ + if (frame_pointer_needed) +- offset -= frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; +- else +- offset += frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ offset -= frame.bytes_below_hard_fp; + + /* Check that we can access the stack slot of the register with one + direct load with no adjustments needed. */ +@@ -9194,9 +9192,7 @@ aarch64_process_components (sbitmap components, bool prologue_p) + rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno); + poly_int64 offset = frame.reg_offsetregno; + if (frame_pointer_needed) +- offset -= frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; +- else +- offset += frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ offset -= frame.bytes_below_hard_fp; + + rtx addr = plus_constant (Pmode, ptr_reg, offset); + rtx mem = gen_frame_mem (mode, addr); +@@ -9248,9 +9244,7 @@ aarch64_process_components (sbitmap components, bool prologue_p) + /* REGNO2 can be saved/restored in a pair with REGNO. */ + rtx reg2 = gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno2); + if (frame_pointer_needed) +- offset2 -= frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; +- else +- offset2 += frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ offset2 -= frame.bytes_below_hard_fp; + rtx addr2 = plus_constant (Pmode, ptr_reg, offset2); + rtx mem2 = gen_frame_mem (mode, addr2); + rtx set2 = prologue_p ? gen_rtx_SET (mem2, reg2) +@@ -9366,7 +9360,8 @@ aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (rtx temp1, rtx temp2, + if (final_adjustment_p + && known_eq (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0)) + { +- poly_int64 lr_offset = frame.reg_offsetLR_REGNUM; ++ poly_int64 lr_offset = (frame.reg_offsetLR_REGNUM ++ - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs); + if (known_ge (lr_offset, 0)) + min_probe_threshold -= lr_offset.to_constant (); + else +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +index 700524ae22bf..b61358370732 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +@@ -860,6 +860,9 @@ extern enum aarch64_processor aarch64_tune; + #ifdef HAVE_POLY_INT_H + struct GTY (()) aarch64_frame + { ++ /* The offset from the bottom of the static frame (the bottom of the ++ outgoing arguments) of each register save slot, or -2 if no save is ++ needed. */ + poly_int64 reg_offsetLAST_SAVED_REGNUM + 1; + + /* The number of extra stack bytes taken up by register varargs. +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0108-aarch64-Simplify-top-of-frame-allocation.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +From b47766614df3b9df878262efb2ad73aaac108363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:53 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Simplify top of frame allocation + +After previous patches, it no longer really makes sense to allocate +the top of the frame in terms of varargs_and_saved_regs_size and +saved_regs_and_above. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Simplify + the allocation of the top of the frame. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 23 ++++++++--------------- + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 97dd077844b4..81935852d5b2 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8325,23 +8325,16 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + frame.saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + +- poly_int64 varargs_and_saved_regs_size +- = frame.saved_regs_size + frame.saved_varargs_size; +- +- poly_int64 saved_regs_and_above +- = aligned_upper_bound (varargs_and_saved_regs_size +- + get_frame_size (), +- STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); +- +- frame.bytes_above_hard_fp +- = saved_regs_and_above - frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ offset += get_frame_size (); ++ offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); ++ auto top_of_locals = offset; + +- /* Both these values are already aligned. */ +- gcc_assert (multiple_p (frame.bytes_below_saved_regs, +- STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT)); +- frame.frame_size = saved_regs_and_above + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ offset += frame.saved_varargs_size; ++ gcc_assert (multiple_p (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT)); ++ frame.frame_size = offset; + +- frame.bytes_above_locals = frame.saved_varargs_size; ++ frame.bytes_above_hard_fp = frame.frame_size - frame.bytes_below_hard_fp; ++ frame.bytes_above_locals = frame.frame_size - top_of_locals; + + frame.initial_adjust = 0; + frame.final_adjust = 0; +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0109-aarch64-Minor-initial-adjustment-tweak.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +From 08f71b4bb28fb74d20e8d2927a557e8119ce9f4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:54 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Minor initial adjustment tweak + +This patch just changes a calculation of initial_adjust +to one that makes it slightly more obvious that the total +adjustment is frame.frame_size. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Tweak + calculation of initial_adjust for frames in which all saves + are SVE saves. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 5 ++--- + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 81935852d5b2..4d9fcf3d1623 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8414,11 +8414,10 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + { + /* Frame in which all saves are SVE saves: + +- sub sp, sp, hard_fp_offset + below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size ++ sub sp, sp, frame_size - bytes_below_saved_regs + save SVE registers relative to SP + sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ +- frame.initial_adjust = (frame.bytes_above_hard_fp +- + frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size); ++ frame.initial_adjust = frame.frame_size - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } + else if (frame.bytes_above_hard_fp.is_constant (&const_above_fp) +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0110-aarch64-Tweak-stack-clash-boundary-condition.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +From f22315d5c19e8310e4dc880fd509678fd291fca8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:54 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Tweak stack clash boundary condition + +The AArch64 ABI says that, when stack clash protection is used, +there can be a maximum of 1KiB of unprobed space at sp on entry +to a function. Therefore, we need to probe when allocating +>= guard_size - 1KiB of data (>= rather than >). This is what +GCC does. + +If an allocation is exactly guard_size bytes, it is enough to allocate +those bytes and probe once at offset 1024. It isn't possible to use a +single probe at any other offset: higher would conmplicate later code, +by leaving more unprobed space than usual, while lower would risk +leaving an entire page unprobed. For simplicity, the code probes all +allocations at offset 1024. + +Some register saves also act as probes. If we need to allocate +more space below the last such register save probe, we need to +probe the allocation if it is > 1KiB. Again, this allocation is +then sometimes (but not always) probed at offset 1024. This sort of +allocation is currently only used for outgoing arguments, which are +rarely this big. + +However, the code also probed if this final outgoing-arguments +allocation was == 1KiB, rather than just > 1KiB. This isn't +necessary, since the register save then probes at offset 1024 +as required. Continuing to probe allocations of exactly 1KiB +would complicate later patches. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space): + Don't probe final allocations that are exactly 1KiB in size (after + unprobed space above the final allocation has been deducted). + +gcc/testsuite/ + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c: New test. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 4 +- + .../aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++ + 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 4d9fcf3d1623..34c1d8614cd9 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -9333,9 +9333,11 @@ aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (rtx temp1, rtx temp2, + HOST_WIDE_INT guard_size + = 1 << param_stack_clash_protection_guard_size; + HOST_WIDE_INT guard_used_by_caller = STACK_CLASH_CALLER_GUARD; ++ HOST_WIDE_INT byte_sp_alignment = STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT; ++ gcc_assert (multiple_p (poly_size, byte_sp_alignment)); + HOST_WIDE_INT min_probe_threshold + = (final_adjustment_p +- ? guard_used_by_caller ++ ? guard_used_by_caller + byte_sp_alignment + : guard_size - guard_used_by_caller); + /* When doing the final adjustment for the outgoing arguments, take into + account any unprobed space there is above the current SP. There are +diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c +new file mode 100644 +index 000000000000..0d8a25d73a24 +--- /dev/null ++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c +@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ ++/* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-clash-protection -fomit-frame-pointer --param stack-clash-protection-guard-size=12" } */ ++/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" } } */ ++ ++void f(int, ...); ++void g(); ++ ++/* ++** test1: ++** ... ++** str x30, \sp\ ++** sub sp, sp, #1024 ++** cbnz w0, .* ++** bl g ++** ... ++*/ ++int test1(int z) { ++ __uint128_t x = 0; ++ int y0x400; ++ if (z) ++ { ++ f(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &y, ++ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, ++ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, ++ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, ++ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x); ++ } ++ g(); ++ return 1; ++} ++ ++/* ++** test2: ++** ... ++** str x30, \sp\ ++** sub sp, sp, #1040 ++** str xzr, \sp\ ++** cbnz w0, .* ++** bl g ++** ... ++*/ ++int test2(int z) { ++ __uint128_t x = 0; ++ int y0x400; ++ if (z) ++ { ++ f(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &y, ++ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, ++ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, ++ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, ++ x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, ++ x); ++ } ++ g(); ++ return 1; ++} +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0111-aarch64-Put-LR-save-probe-in-first-16-bytes.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,406 @@ +From 15e18831bf98fd25af098b970ebf0c9a6200a34b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:55 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Put LR save probe in first 16 bytes + +-fstack-clash-protection uses the save of LR as a probe for the next +allocation. The next allocation could be: + +* another part of the static frame, e.g. when allocating SVE save slots + or outgoing arguments + +* an alloca in the same function + +* an allocation made by a callee function + +However, when -fomit-frame-pointer is used, the LR save slot is placed +above the other GPR save slots. It could therefore be up to 80 bytes +above the base of the GPR save area (which is also the hard fp address). + +aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space took this into account when +deciding how much subsequent space could be allocated without needing +a probe. However, it interacted badly with: + + /* If doing a small final adjustment, we always probe at offset 0. + This is done to avoid issues when LR is not at position 0 or when + the final adjustment is smaller than the probing offset. */ + else if (final_adjustment_p && rounded_size == 0) + residual_probe_offset = 0; + +which forces any allocation that is smaller than the guard page size +to be probed at offset 0 rather than the usual offset 1024. It was +therefore possible to construct cases in which we had: + +* a probe using LR at SP + 80 bytes (or some other value >= 16) +* an allocation of the guard page size - 16 bytes +* a probe at SP + 0 + +which allocates guard page size + 64 consecutive unprobed bytes. + +This patch requires the LR probe to be in the first 16 bytes of the +save area when stack clash protection is active. Doing it +unconditionally would cause code-quality regressions. + +Putting LR before other registers prevents push/pop allocation +when shadow call stacks are enabled, since LR is restored +separately from the other callee-saved registers. + +The new comment doesn't say that the probe register is required +to be LR, since a later patch removes that restriction. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Ensure that + the LR save slot is in the first 16 bytes of the register save area. + Only form STP/LDP push/pop candidates if both registers are valid. + (aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space): Remove workaround for + when LR was not in the first 16 bytes. + +gcc/testsuite/ + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c: New test. + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c: Likewise. + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-20.c: Likewise. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 72 ++++++------- + .../aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++ + .../aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++ + .../aarch64/stack-check-prologue-20.c | 3 + + 4 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) + create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c + create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c + create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-20.c + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 34c1d8614cd9..16433fb70f4f 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8273,26 +8273,34 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + bool saves_below_hard_fp_p + = maybe_ne (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0); + frame.bytes_below_hard_fp = offset; ++ ++ auto allocate_gpr_slot = &(unsigned int regno) ++ { ++ frame.reg_offsetregno = offset; ++ if (frame.wb_push_candidate1 == INVALID_REGNUM) ++ frame.wb_push_candidate1 = regno; ++ else if (frame.wb_push_candidate2 == INVALID_REGNUM) ++ frame.wb_push_candidate2 = regno; ++ offset += UNITS_PER_WORD; ++ }; ++ + if (frame.emit_frame_chain) + { + /* FP and LR are placed in the linkage record. */ +- frame.reg_offsetR29_REGNUM = offset; +- frame.wb_push_candidate1 = R29_REGNUM; +- frame.reg_offsetR30_REGNUM = offset + UNITS_PER_WORD; +- frame.wb_push_candidate2 = R30_REGNUM; +- offset += 2 * UNITS_PER_WORD; ++ allocate_gpr_slot (R29_REGNUM); ++ allocate_gpr_slot (R30_REGNUM); + } ++ else if (flag_stack_clash_protection ++ && known_eq (frame.reg_offsetR30_REGNUM, SLOT_REQUIRED)) ++ /* Put the LR save slot first, since it makes a good choice of probe ++ for stack clash purposes. The idea is that the link register usually ++ has to be saved before a call anyway, and so we lose little by ++ stopping it from being individually shrink-wrapped. */ ++ allocate_gpr_slot (R30_REGNUM); + + for (regno = R0_REGNUM; regno <= R30_REGNUM; regno++) + if (known_eq (frame.reg_offsetregno, SLOT_REQUIRED)) +- { +- frame.reg_offsetregno = offset; +- if (frame.wb_push_candidate1 == INVALID_REGNUM) +- frame.wb_push_candidate1 = regno; +- else if (frame.wb_push_candidate2 == INVALID_REGNUM) +- frame.wb_push_candidate2 = regno; +- offset += UNITS_PER_WORD; +- } ++ allocate_gpr_slot (regno); + + poly_int64 max_int_offset = offset; + offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); +@@ -8370,10 +8378,13 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + max_push_offset to 0, because no registers are popped at this time, + so callee_adjust cannot be adjusted. */ + HOST_WIDE_INT max_push_offset = 0; +- if (frame.wb_pop_candidate2 != INVALID_REGNUM) +- max_push_offset = 512; +- else if (frame.wb_pop_candidate1 != INVALID_REGNUM) +- max_push_offset = 256; ++ if (frame.wb_pop_candidate1 != INVALID_REGNUM) ++ { ++ if (frame.wb_pop_candidate2 != INVALID_REGNUM) ++ max_push_offset = 512; ++ else ++ max_push_offset = 256; ++ } + + HOST_WIDE_INT const_size, const_below_saved_regs, const_above_fp; + HOST_WIDE_INT const_saved_regs_size; +@@ -9339,29 +9350,6 @@ aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (rtx temp1, rtx temp2, + = (final_adjustment_p + ? guard_used_by_caller + byte_sp_alignment + : guard_size - guard_used_by_caller); +- /* When doing the final adjustment for the outgoing arguments, take into +- account any unprobed space there is above the current SP. There are +- two cases: +- +- - When saving SVE registers below the hard frame pointer, we force +- the lowest save to take place in the prologue before doing the final +- adjustment (i.e. we don't allow the save to be shrink-wrapped). +- This acts as a probe at SP, so there is no unprobed space. +- +- - When there are no SVE register saves, we use the store of the link +- register as a probe. We can't assume that LR was saved at position 0 +- though, so treat any space below it as unprobed. */ +- if (final_adjustment_p +- && known_eq (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0)) +- { +- poly_int64 lr_offset = (frame.reg_offsetLR_REGNUM +- - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs); +- if (known_ge (lr_offset, 0)) +- min_probe_threshold -= lr_offset.to_constant (); +- else +- gcc_assert (!flag_stack_clash_protection || known_eq (poly_size, 0)); +- } +- + poly_int64 frame_size = frame.frame_size; + + /* We should always have a positive probe threshold. */ +@@ -9541,8 +9529,8 @@ aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (rtx temp1, rtx temp2, + if (final_adjustment_p && rounded_size != 0) + min_probe_threshold = 0; + /* If doing a small final adjustment, we always probe at offset 0. +- This is done to avoid issues when LR is not at position 0 or when +- the final adjustment is smaller than the probing offset. */ ++ This is done to avoid issues when the final adjustment is smaller ++ than the probing offset. */ + else if (final_adjustment_p && rounded_size == 0) + residual_probe_offset = 0; + +diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c +new file mode 100644 +index 000000000000..82447d20fff5 +--- /dev/null ++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c +@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ ++/* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-clash-protection -fomit-frame-pointer --param stack-clash-protection-guard-size=12" } */ ++/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" } } */ ++ ++void f(int, ...); ++void g(); ++ ++/* ++** test1: ++** ... ++** str x30, \sp\ ++** sub sp, sp, #4064
View file
_service:tar_scm:0112-aarch64-Simplify-probe-of-final-frame-allocation.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +From c4f0e121faa36342f1d21919e54a05ad841c4f86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:55 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Simplify probe of final frame allocation + +Previous patches ensured that the final frame allocation only needs +a probe when the size is strictly greater than 1KiB. It's therefore +safe to use the normal 1024 probe offset in all cases. + +The main motivation for doing this is to simplify the code and +remove the number of special cases. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space): + Always probe the residual allocation at offset 1024, asserting + that that is in range. + +gcc/testsuite/ + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c: Expect the probe + to be at offset 1024 rather than offset 0. + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c: Likewise. + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c: Likewise. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 12 ++++-------- + .../gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c | 2 +- + .../gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c | 4 ++-- + .../gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c | 4 ++-- + 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 16433fb70f4f..8abf3d7a1e2b 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -9523,16 +9523,12 @@ aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (rtx temp1, rtx temp2, + are still safe. */ + if (residual) + { +- HOST_WIDE_INT residual_probe_offset = guard_used_by_caller; ++ gcc_assert (guard_used_by_caller + byte_sp_alignment <= size); ++ + /* If we're doing final adjustments, and we've done any full page + allocations then any residual needs to be probed. */ + if (final_adjustment_p && rounded_size != 0) + min_probe_threshold = 0; +- /* If doing a small final adjustment, we always probe at offset 0. +- This is done to avoid issues when the final adjustment is smaller +- than the probing offset. */ +- else if (final_adjustment_p && rounded_size == 0) +- residual_probe_offset = 0; + + aarch64_sub_sp (temp1, temp2, residual, frame_related_p); + if (residual >= min_probe_threshold) +@@ -9543,8 +9539,8 @@ aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (rtx temp1, rtx temp2, + HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC " bytes, probing will be required." + "\n", residual); + +- emit_stack_probe (plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, +- residual_probe_offset)); ++ emit_stack_probe (plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, ++ guard_used_by_caller)); + emit_insn (gen_blockage ()); + } + } +diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c +index 0d8a25d73a24..f0ec1389771d 100644 +--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c ++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-17.c +@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int test1(int z) { + ** ... + ** str x30, \sp\ + ** sub sp, sp, #1040 +-** str xzr, \sp\ ++** str xzr, \sp, #?1024\ + ** cbnz w0, .* + ** bl g + ** ... +diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c +index 82447d20fff5..6383bec5ebcd 100644 +--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c ++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-18.c +@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ void g(); + ** ... + ** str x30, \sp\ + ** sub sp, sp, #4064 +-** str xzr, \sp\ ++** str xzr, \sp, #?1024\ + ** cbnz w0, .* + ** bl g + ** ... +@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ int test1(int z) { + ** ... + ** str x30, \sp\ + ** sub sp, sp, #1040 +-** str xzr, \sp\ ++** str xzr, \sp, #?1024\ + ** cbnz w0, .* + ** bl g + ** ... +diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c +index 73ac3e4e4eb0..562039b5e9b8 100644 +--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c ++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-check-prologue-19.c +@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ void g(); + ** ... + ** str x30, \sp\ + ** sub sp, sp, #4064 +-** str xzr, \sp\ ++** str xzr, \sp, #?1024\ + ** cbnz w0, .* + ** bl g + ** ... +@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ int test1(int z) { + ** ... + ** str x30, \sp\ + ** sub sp, sp, #1040 +-** str xzr, \sp\ ++** str xzr, \sp, #?1024\ + ** cbnz w0, .* + ** bl g + ** ... +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0113-aarch64-Explicitly-record-probe-registers-in-frame-info.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ +From 6f0ab0a9f46a17b68349ff6035aa776bf65f0575 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:56 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Explicitly record probe registers in frame info + +The stack frame is currently divided into three areas: + +A: the area above the hard frame pointer +B: the SVE saves below the hard frame pointer +C: the outgoing arguments + +If the stack frame is allocated in one chunk, the allocation needs a +probe if the frame size is >= guard_size - 1KiB. In addition, if the +function is not a leaf function, it must probe an address no more than +1KiB above the outgoing SP. We ensured the second condition by + +(1) using single-chunk allocations for non-leaf functions only if + the link register save slot is within 512 bytes of the bottom + of the frame; and + +(2) using the link register save as a probe (meaning, for instance, + that it can't be individually shrink wrapped) + +If instead the stack is allocated in multiple chunks, then: + +* an allocation involving only the outgoing arguments (C above) requires + a probe if the allocation size is > 1KiB + +* any other allocation requires a probe if the allocation size + is >= guard_size - 1KiB + +* second and subsequent allocations require the previous allocation + to probe at the bottom of the allocated area, regardless of the size + of that previous allocation + +The final point means that, unlike for single allocations, +it can be necessary to have both a non-SVE register probe and +an SVE register probe. For example: + +* allocate A, probe using a non-SVE register save +* allocate B, probe using an SVE register save +* allocate C + +The non-SVE register used in this case was again the link register. +It was previously used even if the link register save slot was some +bytes above the bottom of the non-SVE register saves, but an earlier +patch avoided that by putting the link register save slot first. + +As a belt-and-braces fix, this patch explicitly records which +probe registers we're using and allows the non-SVE probe to be +whichever register comes first (as for SVE). + +The patch also avoids unnecessary probes in sve/pcs/stack_clash_3.c. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame::sve_save_and_probe) + (aarch64_frame::hard_fp_save_and_probe): New fields. + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Initialize them. + Rather than asserting that a leaf function saves LR, instead assert + that a leaf function saves something. + (aarch64_get_separate_components): Prevent the chosen probe + registers from being individually shrink-wrapped. + (aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space): Remove workaround for + probe registers that aren't at the bottom of the previous allocation. + +gcc/testsuite/ + * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pcs/stack_clash_3.c: Avoid redundant probes. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 68 +++++++++++++++---- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 8 +++ + .../aarch64/sve/pcs/stack_clash_3.c | 6 +- + 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 8abf3d7a1e2b..a8d907df8843 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8210,15 +8210,11 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + && !crtl->abi->clobbers_full_reg_p (regno)) + frame.reg_offsetregno = SLOT_REQUIRED; + +- /* With stack-clash, LR must be saved in non-leaf functions. The saving of +- LR counts as an implicit probe which allows us to maintain the invariant +- described in the comment at expand_prologue. */ +- gcc_assert (crtl->is_leaf +- || maybe_ne (frame.reg_offsetR30_REGNUM, SLOT_NOT_REQUIRED)); + + poly_int64 offset = crtl->outgoing_args_size; + gcc_assert (multiple_p (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT)); + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs = offset; ++ frame.sve_save_and_probe = INVALID_REGNUM; + + /* Now assign stack slots for the registers. Start with the predicate + registers, since predicate LDR and STR have a relatively small +@@ -8226,6 +8222,8 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + for (regno = P0_REGNUM; regno <= P15_REGNUM; regno++) + if (known_eq (frame.reg_offsetregno, SLOT_REQUIRED)) + { ++ if (frame.sve_save_and_probe == INVALID_REGNUM) ++ frame.sve_save_and_probe = regno; + frame.reg_offsetregno = offset; + offset += BYTES_PER_SVE_PRED; + } +@@ -8263,6 +8261,8 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + for (regno = V0_REGNUM; regno <= V31_REGNUM; regno++) + if (known_eq (frame.reg_offsetregno, SLOT_REQUIRED)) + { ++ if (frame.sve_save_and_probe == INVALID_REGNUM) ++ frame.sve_save_and_probe = regno; + frame.reg_offsetregno = offset; + offset += vector_save_size; + } +@@ -8272,10 +8272,18 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + bool saves_below_hard_fp_p + = maybe_ne (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0); ++ gcc_assert (!saves_below_hard_fp_p ++ || (frame.sve_save_and_probe != INVALID_REGNUM ++ && known_eq (frame.reg_offsetframe.sve_save_and_probe, ++ frame.bytes_below_saved_regs))); ++ + frame.bytes_below_hard_fp = offset; ++ frame.hard_fp_save_and_probe = INVALID_REGNUM; + + auto allocate_gpr_slot = &(unsigned int regno) + { ++ if (frame.hard_fp_save_and_probe == INVALID_REGNUM) ++ frame.hard_fp_save_and_probe = regno; + frame.reg_offsetregno = offset; + if (frame.wb_push_candidate1 == INVALID_REGNUM) + frame.wb_push_candidate1 = regno; +@@ -8309,6 +8317,8 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + for (regno = V0_REGNUM; regno <= V31_REGNUM; regno++) + if (known_eq (frame.reg_offsetregno, SLOT_REQUIRED)) + { ++ if (frame.hard_fp_save_and_probe == INVALID_REGNUM) ++ frame.hard_fp_save_and_probe = regno; + /* If there is an alignment gap between integer and fp callee-saves, + allocate the last fp register to it if possible. */ + if (regno == last_fp_reg +@@ -8332,6 +8342,17 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); + + frame.saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ gcc_assert (known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, ++ frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size) ++ || (frame.hard_fp_save_and_probe != INVALID_REGNUM ++ && known_eq (frame.reg_offsetframe.hard_fp_save_and_probe, ++ frame.bytes_below_hard_fp))); ++ ++ /* With stack-clash, a register must be saved in non-leaf functions. ++ The saving of the bottommost register counts as an implicit probe, ++ which allows us to maintain the invariant described in the comment ++ at expand_prologue. */ ++ gcc_assert (crtl->is_leaf || maybe_ne (frame.saved_regs_size, 0)); + + offset += get_frame_size (); + offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); +@@ -8462,6 +8483,25 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } + ++ /* The frame is allocated in pieces, with each non-final piece ++ including a register save at offset 0 that acts as a probe for ++ the following piece. In addition, the save of the bottommost register ++ acts as a probe for callees and allocas. Roll back any probes that ++ aren't needed. ++ ++ A probe isn't needed if it is associated with the final allocation ++ (including callees and allocas) that happens before the epilogue is ++ executed. */ ++ if (crtl->is_leaf ++ && !cfun->calls_alloca ++ && known_eq (frame.final_adjust, 0)) ++ { ++ if (maybe_ne (frame.sve_callee_adjust, 0)) ++ frame.sve_save_and_probe = INVALID_REGNUM; ++ else ++ frame.hard_fp_save_and_probe = INVALID_REGNUM; ++ } ++ + /* Make sure the individual adjustments add up to the full frame size. */ + gcc_assert (known_eq (frame.initial_adjust + + frame.callee_adjust +@@ -9039,13 +9079,6 @@ aarch64_get_separate_components (void) + + poly_int64 offset = frame.reg_offsetregno; + +- /* If the register is saved in the first SVE save slot, we use +- it as a stack probe for -fstack-clash-protection. */ +- if (flag_stack_clash_protection +- && maybe_ne (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0) +- && known_eq (offset, frame.bytes_below_saved_regs)) +- continue; +- + /* Get the offset relative to the register we'll use. */ + if (frame_pointer_needed) + offset -= frame.bytes_below_hard_fp; +@@ -9080,6 +9113,13 @@ aarch64_get_separate_components (void)
View file
_service:tar_scm:0114-aarch64-Remove-below-hard-fp-saved-regs-size.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +From 8254e1b9cd500e0c278465a3657543477e9d1250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:56 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Remove below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size + +After previous patches, it's no longer necessary to store +saved_regs_size and below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size in the frame info. +All measurements instead use the top or bottom of the frame as +reference points. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (aarch64_frame::saved_regs_size) + (aarch64_frame::below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size): Delete. + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_layout_frame): Update accordingly. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 45 ++++++++++++++++------------------- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h | 7 ------ + 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index a8d907df8843..ac3d3b336a37 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8269,9 +8269,8 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + /* OFFSET is now the offset of the hard frame pointer from the bottom + of the callee save area. */ +- frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; +- bool saves_below_hard_fp_p +- = maybe_ne (frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0); ++ auto below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ bool saves_below_hard_fp_p = maybe_ne (below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size, 0); + gcc_assert (!saves_below_hard_fp_p + || (frame.sve_save_and_probe != INVALID_REGNUM + && known_eq (frame.reg_offsetframe.sve_save_and_probe, +@@ -8341,9 +8340,8 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); + +- frame.saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; +- gcc_assert (known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, +- frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size) ++ auto saved_regs_size = offset - frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; ++ gcc_assert (known_eq (saved_regs_size, below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size) + || (frame.hard_fp_save_and_probe != INVALID_REGNUM + && known_eq (frame.reg_offsetframe.hard_fp_save_and_probe, + frame.bytes_below_hard_fp))); +@@ -8352,7 +8350,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + The saving of the bottommost register counts as an implicit probe, + which allows us to maintain the invariant described in the comment + at expand_prologue. */ +- gcc_assert (crtl->is_leaf || maybe_ne (frame.saved_regs_size, 0)); ++ gcc_assert (crtl->is_leaf || maybe_ne (saved_regs_size, 0)); + + offset += get_frame_size (); + offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); +@@ -8409,7 +8407,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + + HOST_WIDE_INT const_size, const_below_saved_regs, const_above_fp; + HOST_WIDE_INT const_saved_regs_size; +- if (known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, 0)) ++ if (known_eq (saved_regs_size, 0)) + frame.initial_adjust = frame.frame_size; + else if (frame.frame_size.is_constant (&const_size) + && const_size < max_push_offset +@@ -8422,7 +8420,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + frame.callee_adjust = const_size; + } + else if (frame.bytes_below_saved_regs.is_constant (&const_below_saved_regs) +- && frame.saved_regs_size.is_constant (&const_saved_regs_size) ++ && saved_regs_size.is_constant (&const_saved_regs_size) + && const_below_saved_regs + const_saved_regs_size < 512 + /* We could handle this case even with data below the saved + registers, provided that that data left us with valid offsets +@@ -8441,8 +8439,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + frame.initial_adjust = frame.frame_size; + } + else if (saves_below_hard_fp_p +- && known_eq (frame.saved_regs_size, +- frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size)) ++ && known_eq (saved_regs_size, below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size)) + { + /* Frame in which all saves are SVE saves: + +@@ -8464,7 +8461,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + save SVE registers relative to SP + sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ + frame.callee_adjust = const_above_fp; +- frame.sve_callee_adjust = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ frame.sve_callee_adjust = below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } + else +@@ -8479,7 +8476,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + save SVE registers relative to SP + sub sp, sp, bytes_below_saved_regs */ + frame.initial_adjust = frame.bytes_above_hard_fp; +- frame.sve_callee_adjust = frame.below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; ++ frame.sve_callee_adjust = below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; + frame.final_adjust = frame.bytes_below_saved_regs; + } + +@@ -9621,17 +9618,17 @@ aarch64_epilogue_uses (int regno) + | local variables | <-- frame_pointer_rtx + | | + +-------------------------------+ +- | padding | \ +- +-------------------------------+ | +- | callee-saved registers | | frame.saved_regs_size +- +-------------------------------+ | +- | LR' | | +- +-------------------------------+ | +- | FP' | | +- +-------------------------------+ |<- hard_frame_pointer_rtx (aligned) +- | SVE vector registers | | \ +- +-------------------------------+ | | below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size +- | SVE predicate registers | / / ++ | padding | ++ +-------------------------------+ ++ | callee-saved registers | ++ +-------------------------------+ ++ | LR' | ++ +-------------------------------+ ++ | FP' | ++ +-------------------------------+ <-- hard_frame_pointer_rtx (aligned) ++ | SVE vector registers | ++ +-------------------------------+ ++ | SVE predicate registers | + +-------------------------------+ + | dynamic allocation | + +-------------------------------+ +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +index 46d4693e2064..01f7751bc783 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h +@@ -871,18 +871,11 @@ struct GTY (()) aarch64_frame + STACK_BOUNDARY. */ + HOST_WIDE_INT saved_varargs_size; + +- /* The size of the callee-save registers with a slot in REG_OFFSET. */ +- poly_int64 saved_regs_size; +- + /* The number of bytes between the bottom of the static frame (the bottom + of the outgoing arguments) and the bottom of the register save area. + This value is always a multiple of STACK_BOUNDARY. */ + poly_int64 bytes_below_saved_regs; + +- /* The size of the callee-save registers with a slot in REG_OFFSET that +- are saved below the hard frame pointer. */ +- poly_int64 below_hard_fp_saved_regs_size; +- + /* The number of bytes between the bottom of the static frame (the bottom + of the outgoing arguments) and the hard frame pointer. This value is + always a multiple of STACK_BOUNDARY. */ +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0115-aarch64-Make-stack-smash-canary-protect-saved-registers.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@ +From 75c37e031408262263442f5b4cdb83d3777b6422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:08:57 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Make stack smash canary protect saved registers + +AArch64 normally puts the saved registers near the bottom of the frame, +immediately above any dynamic allocations. But this means that a +stack-smash attack on those dynamic allocations could overwrite the +saved registers without needing to reach as far as the stack smash +canary. + +The same thing could also happen for variable-sized arguments that are +passed by value, since those are allocated before a call and popped on +return. + +This patch avoids that by putting the locals (and thus the canary) below +the saved registers when stack smash protection is active. + +The patch fixes CVE-2023-4039. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_save_regs_above_locals_p): + New function. + (aarch64_layout_frame): Use it to decide whether locals should + go above or below the saved registers. + (aarch64_expand_prologue): Update stack layout comment. + Emit a stack tie after the final adjustment. + +gcc/testsuite/ + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-8.c: New test. + * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-9.c: Likewise. +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 46 +++++++-- + .../gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-8.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++ + .../gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-9.c | 33 +++++++ + 3 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) + create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-8.c + create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-9.c + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index ac3d3b336a37..96c3f48fdc49 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -8133,6 +8133,20 @@ aarch64_needs_frame_chain (void) + return aarch64_use_frame_pointer; + } + ++/* Return true if the current function should save registers above ++ the locals area, rather than below it. */ ++ ++static bool ++aarch64_save_regs_above_locals_p () ++{ ++ /* When using stack smash protection, make sure that the canary slot ++ comes between the locals and the saved registers. Otherwise, ++ it would be possible for a carefully sized smash attack to change ++ the saved registers (particularly LR and FP) without reaching the ++ canary. */ ++ return crtl->stack_protect_guard; ++} ++ + /* Mark the registers that need to be saved by the callee and calculate + the size of the callee-saved registers area and frame record (both FP + and LR may be omitted). */ +@@ -8144,6 +8158,7 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + poly_int64 vector_save_size = GET_MODE_SIZE (vector_save_mode); + bool frame_related_fp_reg_p = false; + aarch64_frame &frame = cfun->machine->frame; ++ poly_int64 top_of_locals = -1; + + frame.emit_frame_chain = aarch64_needs_frame_chain (); + +@@ -8210,9 +8225,16 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + && !crtl->abi->clobbers_full_reg_p (regno)) + frame.reg_offsetregno = SLOT_REQUIRED; + ++ bool regs_at_top_p = aarch64_save_regs_above_locals_p (); + + poly_int64 offset = crtl->outgoing_args_size; + gcc_assert (multiple_p (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT)); ++ if (regs_at_top_p) ++ { ++ offset += get_frame_size (); ++ offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); ++ top_of_locals = offset; ++ } + frame.bytes_below_saved_regs = offset; + frame.sve_save_and_probe = INVALID_REGNUM; + +@@ -8352,15 +8374,18 @@ aarch64_layout_frame (void) + at expand_prologue. */ + gcc_assert (crtl->is_leaf || maybe_ne (saved_regs_size, 0)); + +- offset += get_frame_size (); +- offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); +- auto top_of_locals = offset; +- ++ if (!regs_at_top_p) ++ { ++ offset += get_frame_size (); ++ offset = aligned_upper_bound (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT); ++ top_of_locals = offset; ++ } + offset += frame.saved_varargs_size; + gcc_assert (multiple_p (offset, STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT)); + frame.frame_size = offset; + + frame.bytes_above_hard_fp = frame.frame_size - frame.bytes_below_hard_fp; ++ gcc_assert (known_ge (top_of_locals, 0)); + frame.bytes_above_locals = frame.frame_size - top_of_locals; + + frame.initial_adjust = 0; +@@ -9615,10 +9640,10 @@ aarch64_epilogue_uses (int regno) + | for register varargs | + | | + +-------------------------------+ +- | local variables | <-- frame_pointer_rtx ++ | local variables (1) | <-- frame_pointer_rtx + | | + +-------------------------------+ +- | padding | ++ | padding (1) | + +-------------------------------+ + | callee-saved registers | + +-------------------------------+ +@@ -9630,6 +9655,10 @@ aarch64_epilogue_uses (int regno) + +-------------------------------+ + | SVE predicate registers | + +-------------------------------+ ++ | local variables (2) | ++ +-------------------------------+ ++ | padding (2) | ++ +-------------------------------+ + | dynamic allocation | + +-------------------------------+ + | padding | +@@ -9639,6 +9668,9 @@ aarch64_epilogue_uses (int regno) + +-------------------------------+ + | | <-- stack_pointer_rtx (aligned) + ++ The regions marked (1) and (2) are mutually exclusive. (2) is used ++ when aarch64_save_regs_above_locals_p is true. ++ + Dynamic stack allocations via alloca() decrease stack_pointer_rtx + but leave frame_pointer_rtx and hard_frame_pointer_rtx + unchanged. +@@ -9834,6 +9866,8 @@ aarch64_expand_prologue (void) + gcc_assert (known_eq (bytes_below_sp, final_adjust)); + aarch64_allocate_and_probe_stack_space (tmp1_rtx, tmp0_rtx, final_adjust, + !frame_pointer_needed, true); ++ if (emit_frame_chain && maybe_ne (final_adjust, 0)) ++ emit_insn (gen_stack_tie (stack_pointer_rtx, hard_frame_pointer_rtx)); + } + + /* Return TRUE if we can use a simple_return insn. +diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-8.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-8.c +new file mode 100644 +index 000000000000..e71d820e3654 +--- /dev/null ++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-8.c +@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ ++/* { dg-options " -O -fstack-protector-strong -mstack-protector-guard=sysreg -mstack-protector-guard-reg=tpidr2_el0 -mstack-protector-guard-offset=16" } */ ++/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" } } */ ++ ++void g(void *); ++__SVBool_t *h(void *); ++ ++/* ++** test1: ++** sub sp, sp, #288 ++** stp x29, x30, \sp, #?272\ ++** add x29, sp, #?272 ++** mrs (x0-9+), tpidr2_el0 ++** ldr (x0-9+), \\1, #?16\ ++** str \2, \sp, #?264\ ++** mov \2, #?0 ++** add x0, sp, #?8 ++** bl g ++** ... ++** mrs .* ++** ... ++** bne .* ++** ... ++** ldp x29, x30, \sp, #?272\ ++** add sp, sp, #?288 ++** ret ++** bl __stack_chk_fail ++*/ ++int test1() { ++ int y0x40; ++ g(y); ++ return 1; ++} ++ ++/* ++** test2: ++** stp x29, x30, \sp, #?-16\! ++** mov x29, sp ++** sub sp, sp, #1040
View file
_service:tar_scm:0116-aarch64-Fix-return-register-handling-in-untyped_call.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +From 38d0605ac8bc90324170041676fc05e7e595769e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:13:19 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Fix return register handling in untyped_call + +While working on another patch, I hit a problem with the aarch64 +expansion of untyped_call. The expander emits the usual: + + (set (mem ...) (reg resN)) + +instructions to store the result registers to memory, but it didn't +say in RTL where those resN results came from. This eventually led +to a failure of gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-2.c, +via regrename. + +This patch turns the untyped call from a plain call to a call_value, +to represent that the call returns (or might return) a useful value. +The patch also uses a PARALLEL return rtx to represent all the possible +return registers. + +gcc/ + * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (untyped_call): Emit a call_value + rather than a call. List each possible destination register + in the call pattern. + +(cherry picked from commit 629efe27744d13c3b83bbe8338b84c37c83dbe4f) +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- + 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md +index b9b3ba4f9164..cd568f3daa0f 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md +@@ -1159,9 +1159,27 @@ + { + int i; + ++ /* Generate a PARALLEL that contains all of the register results. ++ The offsets are somewhat arbitrary, since we don't know the ++ actual return type. The main thing we need to avoid is having ++ overlapping byte ranges, since those might give the impression ++ that two registers are known to have data in common. */ ++ rtvec rets = rtvec_alloc (XVECLEN (operands2, 0)); ++ poly_int64 offset = 0; ++ for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (operands2, 0); i++) ++ { ++ rtx reg = SET_SRC (XVECEXP (operands2, 0, i)); ++ gcc_assert (REG_P (reg)); ++ rtx offset_rtx = gen_int_mode (offset, Pmode); ++ rtx piece = gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, reg, offset_rtx); ++ RTVEC_ELT (rets, i) = piece; ++ offset += GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (reg)); ++ } ++ rtx ret = gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, rets); ++ + /* Untyped calls always use the default ABI. It's only possible to use + ABI variants if we know the type of the target function. */ +- emit_call_insn (gen_call (operands0, const0_rtx, const0_rtx)); ++ emit_call_insn (gen_call_value (ret, operands0, const0_rtx, const0_rtx)); + + for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (operands2, 0); i++) + { +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service:tar_scm:0117-aarch64-Fix-loose-ldpstp-check.patch
Added
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +From 74f99f1adc696f446115f36974a3f94f66294a53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> +Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:13:20 +0100 +Subject: PATCH aarch64: Fix loose ldpstp check PR111411 + +aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp contained the code: + + /* One of the memory accesses must be a mempair operand. + If it is not the first one, they need to be swapped by the + peephole. */ + if (!aarch64_mem_pair_operand (mem_1, GET_MODE (mem_1)) + && !aarch64_mem_pair_operand (mem_2, GET_MODE (mem_2))) + return false; + +But the requirement isn't just that one of the accesses must be a +valid mempair operand. It's that the lower access must be, since +that's the access that will be used for the instruction operand. + +gcc/ + PR target/111411 + * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp): Require + the lower memory access to a mem-pair operand. + +gcc/testsuite/ + PR target/111411 + * gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/pr111411.c: New test. + +(cherry picked from commit 2d38f45bcca62ca0c7afef4b579f82c5c2a01610) +--- + gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 ++- + gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/pr111411.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++ + 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) + create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/pr111411.c + +diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +index 96c3f48fdc49..a979accd90a9 100644 +--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc ++++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +@@ -26031,11 +26031,9 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx *operands, bool load, + gcc_assert (known_eq (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (mem_1)), + GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (mem_2)))); + +- /* One of the memory accesses must be a mempair operand. +- If it is not the first one, they need to be swapped by the +- peephole. */ +- if (!aarch64_mem_pair_operand (mem_1, GET_MODE (mem_1)) +- && !aarch64_mem_pair_operand (mem_2, GET_MODE (mem_2))) ++ /* The lower memory access must be a mem-pair operand. */ ++ rtx lower_mem = reversed ? mem_2 : mem_1; ++ if (!aarch64_mem_pair_operand (lower_mem, GET_MODE (lower_mem))) + return false; + + if (REG_P (reg_1) && FP_REGNUM_P (REGNO (reg_1))) +diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/pr111411.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/pr111411.c +new file mode 100644 +index 000000000000..ad07e9c6c893 +--- /dev/null ++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/pr111411.c +@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ ++/* { dg-do compile { target aarch64*-*-* } } */ ++/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */ ++/* { dg-options "-O -fdisable-rtl-postreload -fpeephole2 -fno-schedule-fusion" } */ ++ ++extern int data; ++ ++void __RTL (startwith ("ira")) foo (void *ptr) ++{ ++ (function "foo" ++ (param "ptr" ++ (DECL_RTL (reg/v:DI <0> ptr )) ++ (DECL_RTL_INCOMING (reg/v:DI x0 ptr )) ++ ) ;; param "ptr" ++ (insn-chain ++ (block 2 ++ (edge-from entry (flags "FALLTHRU")) ++ (cnote 3 bb 2 NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) ++ (insn 4 (set (reg:DI <0>) (reg:DI x0))) ++ (insn 5 (set (reg:DI <1>) ++ (plus:DI (reg:DI <0>) (const_int 768)))) ++ (insn 6 (set (mem:SI (plus:DI (reg:DI <0>) ++ (const_int 508)) 1 &data+508 S4 A4) ++ (const_int 0))) ++ (insn 7 (set (mem:SI (plus:DI (reg:DI <1>) ++ (const_int -256)) 1 &data+512 S4 A4) ++ (const_int 0))) ++ (edge-to exit (flags "FALLTHRU")) ++ ) ;; block 2 ++ ) ;; insn-chain ++ ) ;; function ++} ++ ++void __RTL (startwith ("ira")) bar (void *ptr) ++{ ++ (function "bar" ++ (param "ptr" ++ (DECL_RTL (reg/v:DI <0> ptr )) ++ (DECL_RTL_INCOMING (reg/v:DI x0 ptr )) ++ ) ;; param "ptr" ++ (insn-chain ++ (block 2 ++ (edge-from entry (flags "FALLTHRU")) ++ (cnote 3 bb 2 NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) ++ (insn 4 (set (reg:DI <0>) (reg:DI x0))) ++ (insn 5 (set (reg:DI <1>) ++ (plus:DI (reg:DI <0>) (const_int 768)))) ++ (insn 6 (set (mem:SI (plus:DI (reg:DI <1>) ++ (const_int -256)) 1 &data+512 S4 A4) ++ (const_int 0))) ++ (insn 7 (set (mem:SI (plus:DI (reg:DI <0>) ++ (const_int 508)) 1 &data+508 S4 A4) ++ (const_int 0))) ++ (edge-to exit (flags "FALLTHRU")) ++ ) ;; block 2 ++ ) ;; insn-chain ++ ) ;; function ++} +-- +2.43.5 +
View file
_service
Changed
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <service name="tar_scm"> <param name="scm">git</param> <param name="url">git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/gcc.git</param> - <param name="revision">openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next</param> + <param name="revision">openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1</param> <param name="exclude">*</param> <param name="extract">*</param> </service>
Locations
Projects
Search
Status Monitor
Help
Open Build Service
OBS Manuals
API Documentation
OBS Portal
Reporting a Bug
Contact
Mailing List
Forums
Chat (IRC)
Twitter
Open Build Service (OBS)
is an
openSUSE project
.
浙ICP备2022010568号-2