File _service:tar_scm:Add-AArch64-clang-longjmp-supp... of Package valgrind

File _service:tar_scm:Add-AArch64-clang-longjmp-support.patch of Package valgrind

diff --git a/include/pub_tool_libcsetjmp.h b/include/pub_tool_libcsetjmp.h
index 681450cef..ccdf295df 100644
--- a/include/pub_tool_libcsetjmp.h
+++ b/include/pub_tool_libcsetjmp.h
@@ -126,6 +126,111 @@ UWord VG_MINIMAL_SETJMP(VG_MINIMAL_JMP_BUF(_env));
 __attribute__((noreturn))
 void  VG_MINIMAL_LONGJMP(VG_MINIMAL_JMP_BUF(_env));
 
+#elif defined __aarch64__ && defined __clang__
+
+// __builtin_setjmp is not implemented by the standard C library
+// used on Android in current llvm-based toolchains as of NDK r19.
+//
+// Here is a custom implementation of Valgrind's "minimal" setjmp
+// interface. Per the comment at the top of this file, we only need
+// to save integer registers.
+//
+// Per the Procedure Call Standard for the ARM 64-bit Architecture
+// document,
+// http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.pdf
+// Section 5.1.1. General-purpose registers:
+// >
+// > A subroutine invocation must preserve the contents of the
+// > registers r19-r29 and SP."
+//
+// We also need to save and restore r30, the link register, i.e.
+// the default destination that a 'ret' instruction branches to.
+//
+// Note that this document is phrased in terms of 'r' registers
+// (e.g. "r30") because it aims to be agnostic as to A64 vs A32
+// instruction sets, but here we are targeting the A64 instruction
+// set, so we are dealing with 'x' registers.
+
+
+#define VG_MINIMAL_JMP_BUF(_name)        UWord _name [13]
+
+__attribute__((returns_twice))
+inline UWord VG_MINIMAL_SETJMP(VG_MINIMAL_JMP_BUF(_env))
+{
+   asm volatile(
+     // x9 is the first of the regular temporary registers
+     // per the above-mentioned Procedule Call Standard document.
+     // Use it as temporary to hold the value of SP, since str does
+     // not accept SP as operand.
+     "  mov x9, sp                     \n"
+     // Store the general-purpose registers that we need to save
+     // per the above discussion.
+     // Note that x30 is the link register.
+     "  stp x19, x20, [%[_env], 0]     \n"
+     "  stp x21, x22, [%[_env], 0x10]  \n"
+     "  stp x23, x24, [%[_env], 0x20]  \n"
+     "  stp x25, x26, [%[_env], 0x30]  \n"
+     "  stp x27, x28, [%[_env], 0x40]  \n"
+     "  stp x29, x30, [%[_env], 0x50]  \n"
+     // Store the value of SP.
+     "  str x9,       [%[_env], 0x60]  \n"
+     :
+     // No outputs
+     :
+     // Inputs
+     [_env]"r"(_env)
+     :
+     // Clobbers.
+     // We have used x9 as a temporary
+     "x9",
+     // We have written to memory locations
+     "memory");
+
+  // Direct invokation of setjmp always returns 0.
+  // The pseudo returning of the value 1 as a return from longjmp
+  // is implemented in longjmp.
+  return 0;
+}
+
+__attribute__((noreturn))
+inline void VG_MINIMAL_LONGJMP(VG_MINIMAL_JMP_BUF(_env))
+{
+   asm volatile(
+     // Loads to match the stores in the above setjmp implementation.
+     "  ldp x19, x20, [%[_env], 0]     \n"
+     "  ldp x21, x22, [%[_env], 0x10]  \n"
+     "  ldp x23, x24, [%[_env], 0x20]  \n"
+     "  ldp x25, x26, [%[_env], 0x30]  \n"
+     "  ldp x27, x28, [%[_env], 0x40]  \n"
+     "  ldp x29, x30, [%[_env], 0x50]  \n"
+     "  ldr x9,       [%[_env], 0x60]  \n"
+     "  mov sp, x9                     \n"
+     // return as setjmp for the second time, returning 1.
+     // Since we have loaded the link register x30 from the saved buffer
+     // that was set by the above setjmp implementation, the 'ret' instruction
+     // here is going to return to where setjmp was called.
+     // Per the setjmp/longjmp contract, that pseudo second returning
+     // of setjmp should return the value 1.
+     // x0 is holds the integer return value.
+     "  mov x0, 1                      \n"
+     "  ret                            \n"
+     :
+     // No outputs
+     :
+     // Inputs
+     [_env]"r"(_env)
+     :
+     // Clobbers.
+     // We have used x9 as a temporary
+     "x9");
+
+  // This statement is unreachable because the above asm statement
+  // unconditionally does a 'ret' instruction. The purpose of this
+  // statement is to silence clang warnings about this function returning
+  // while having the 'noreturn' attribute.
+  __builtin_unreachable();
+}
+
 #else
 
 /* The default implementation. */
 --