File _service:tar_scm:backport-Fix-checking-of-connt... of Package iptables

File _service:tar_scm:backport-Fix-checking-of-conntrack-ctproto.patch of Package iptables (Revision a1cb72464cb4ec90100ccead303d5f21)

Currently displaying revision a1cb72464cb4ec90100ccead303d5f21 , Show latest

From 2e704f6ddd6d056e360f3d9c11e8b6c56a20cf23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quentin Armitage <quentin@armitage.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 08:41:58 +0000
Subject: extensions: Fix checking of conntrack --ctproto 0

There are three issues in the code:
1) the check (sinfo->invflags & XT_INV_PROTO) is using the wrong mask
2) in conntrack_mt_parse it is testing (info->invert_flags &
   XT_INV_PROTO) before the invert bit has been set.
3) the sense of the error message is the wrong way round

1) To get the error, ! -ctstatus XXX has to be specified, since
   XT_INV_PROTO == XT_CONNTRACK_STATUS e.g.
   | iptables -I CHAIN -m conntrack ! --ctstatus ASSURED --ctproto 0 ...

3) Unlike --proto 0 (where 0 means all protocols), in the conntrack
   match --ctproto 0 appears to mean protocol 0, which can never be.
   Therefore --ctproto 0 could never match and ! --ctproto 0 will always
   match. Both of these should be rejected, since the user clearly
   cannot be intending what was specified.

The attached patch resolves the issue, and also produces an error
message if --ctproto 0 is specified (as well as ! --ctproto 0 ), since
--ctproto 0 will never match, and ! --ctproto 0 will always match.

[Phil: - Added Fixes: tag - it's a day 1 bug
       - Copied patch description from Bugzilla
       - Reorganized changes to reduce diff
       - Added test cases]

Closes: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=874
Fixes: 5054e85be3068 ("general conntrack match module userspace support files")
Signed-off-by: Quentin Armitage <quentin@armitage.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>

Conflict:NA
Reference:https://git.netfilter.org/iptables//commit/?id=2e704f6ddd6d056e360f3d9c11e8b6c56a20cf23

---
 extensions/libxt_conntrack.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 extensions/libxt_conntrack.t |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/extensions/libxt_conntrack.c b/extensions/libxt_conntrack.c
index 7734509..3cc678f 100644
--- a/extensions/libxt_conntrack.c
+++ b/extensions/libxt_conntrack.c
@@ -346,14 +346,13 @@ static void conntrack_parse(struct xt_option_call *cb)
 			sinfo->invflags |= XT_CONNTRACK_STATE;
 		break;
 	case O_CTPROTO:
+		if (cb->val.protocol == 0)
+			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM, cb->invert ?
+				      "condition would always match protocol" :
+				      "rule would never match protocol");
 		sinfo->tuple[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].dst.protonum = cb->val.protocol;
 		if (cb->invert)
 			sinfo->invflags |= XT_CONNTRACK_PROTO;
-		if (sinfo->tuple[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].dst.protonum == 0
-		    && (sinfo->invflags & XT_INV_PROTO))
-			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-				   "rule would never match protocol");
-
 		sinfo->flags |= XT_CONNTRACK_PROTO;
 		break;
 	case O_CTORIGSRC:
@@ -411,11 +410,11 @@ static void conntrack_mt_parse(struct xt_option_call *cb, uint8_t rev)
 			info->invert_flags |= XT_CONNTRACK_STATE;
 		break;
 	case O_CTPROTO:
+		if (cb->val.protocol == 0)
+			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM, cb->invert ?
+				      "conntrack: condition would always match protocol" :
+				      "conntrack: rule would never match protocol");
 		info->l4proto = cb->val.protocol;
-		if (info->l4proto == 0 && (info->invert_flags & XT_INV_PROTO))
-			xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM, "conntrack: rule would "
-			           "never match protocol");
-
 		info->match_flags |= XT_CONNTRACK_PROTO;
 		if (cb->invert)
 			info->invert_flags |= XT_CONNTRACK_PROTO;
diff --git a/extensions/libxt_conntrack.t b/extensions/libxt_conntrack.t
index db53147..2b3c5de 100644
--- a/extensions/libxt_conntrack.t
+++ b/extensions/libxt_conntrack.t
@@ -25,3 +25,5 @@
 -m conntrack --ctstatus EXPECTED;=;OK
 -m conntrack --ctstatus SEEN_REPLY;=;OK
 -m conntrack;;FAIL
+-m conntrack --ctproto 0;;FAIL
+-m conntrack ! --ctproto 0;;FAIL
-- 
2.33.0