File _service:tar_scm:backport-clang-0044-malloc-Sup... of Package glibc

File _service:tar_scm:backport-clang-0044-malloc-Suppress-clang-warning-on-tst-aligned-alloc.patch of Package glibc (Revision 756e0ca71b8eecd09f8ca555e0cce4dd)

Currently displaying revision 756e0ca71b8eecd09f8ca555e0cce4dd , Show latest

From cb40ee75995a53b234b3e5c613d4f8a6db002e0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:55:42 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] malloc: Suppress clang warning on tst-aligned-alloc

---
 malloc/tst-aligned-alloc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/malloc/tst-aligned-alloc.c b/malloc/tst-aligned-alloc.c
index 8bd6527147..23616dfa5b 100644
--- a/malloc/tst-aligned-alloc.c
+++ b/malloc/tst-aligned-alloc.c
@@ -55,18 +55,31 @@ do_test (void)
   if (p2 == NULL)
     FAIL_EXIT1 ("aligned_alloc(1, 64) failed");
 
+  /* clang warns that alignment is not a power of 2, which is what the
+     test means to do.  */
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (18.0, "-Wnon-power-of-two-alignment");
   p3 = aligned_alloc (65, 64);
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
 
   if (p3 != NULL)
     FAIL_EXIT1 ("aligned_alloc(65, 64) did not fail");
 
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (18.0, "-Wnon-power-of-two-alignment");
   p4 = aligned_alloc (0, 64);
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
 
   if (p4 != NULL)
     FAIL_EXIT1 ("aligned_alloc(0, 64) did not fail");
 
+  /* clang warns that alignment must be 4294967296 or smaller, which is
+     what the test means to do.  */
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG (18.0, "-Wbuiltin-assume-aligned-alignment");
   /* This is an alignment like 0x80000000...UL */
   p5 = aligned_alloc (SIZE_MAX / 2 + 1, 64);
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT_CLANG;
 
   if (p5 != NULL)
     FAIL_EXIT1 ("aligned_alloc(SIZE_MAX/2+1, 64) did not fail");
-- 
2.39.3