Projects
openEuler:24.03:SP1:Everything
gcc
_service:tar_scm:0149-Backport-SME-Add-a-target...
Sign Up
Log In
Username
Password
Overview
Repositories
Revisions
Requests
Users
Attributes
Meta
File _service:tar_scm:0149-Backport-SME-Add-a-target-hook-for-sibcall-epilogues.patch of Package gcc
From e906213086639df81085a0101bf88fb66c1dbc2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 09:35:57 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 050/157] [Backport][SME] Add a target hook for sibcall epilogues Reference: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=2e0aefa77157396acb48833407637303edba450a Epilogues for sibling calls are generated using the sibcall_epilogue pattern. One disadvantage of this approach is that the target doesn't know which call the epilogue is for, even though the code that generates the pattern has the call to hand. Although call instructions are currently rtxes, and so could be passed as an operand to the pattern, the main point of introducing rtx_insn was to move towards separating the rtx and insn types (a good thing IMO). There also isn't an existing practice of passing genuine instructions (as opposed to labels) to instruction patterns. This patch therefore adds a hook that can be defined as an alternative to sibcall_epilogue. The advantage is that it can be passed the call; the disadvantage is that it can't use .md conveniences like generating instructions from textual patterns (although most epilogues are too complex to benefit much from that anyway). gcc/ * doc/tm.texi.in: Add TARGET_EMIT_EPILOGUE_FOR_SIBCALL. * doc/tm.texi: Regenerate. * target.def (emit_epilogue_for_sibcall): New hook. * calls.cc (can_implement_as_sibling_call_p): Use it. * function.cc (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Likewise. (reposition_prologue_and_epilogue_notes): Likewise. * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_expand_epilogue): Take an rtx_call_insn * rather than a bool. * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_expand_epilogue): Likewise. (TARGET_EMIT_EPILOGUE_FOR_SIBCALL): Define. * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (epilogue): Update call. (sibcall_epilogue): Delete. --- gcc/calls.cc | 3 ++- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h | 2 +- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 11 +++++++---- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md | 11 +---------- gcc/doc/tm.texi | 8 ++++++++ gcc/doc/tm.texi.in | 2 ++ gcc/function.cc | 15 +++++++++++++-- gcc/target.def | 9 +++++++++ 8 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/calls.cc b/gcc/calls.cc index 4d0bc45be..c1db66883 100644 --- a/gcc/calls.cc +++ b/gcc/calls.cc @@ -2461,7 +2461,8 @@ can_implement_as_sibling_call_p (tree exp, tree addr, const args_size &args_size) { - if (!targetm.have_sibcall_epilogue ()) + if (!targetm.have_sibcall_epilogue () + && !targetm.emit_epilogue_for_sibcall) { maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h index 86e444a60..97984f3ab 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ const char * aarch64_gen_far_branch (rtx *, int, const char *, const char *); const char * aarch64_output_probe_stack_range (rtx, rtx); const char * aarch64_output_probe_sve_stack_clash (rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx); void aarch64_err_no_fpadvsimd (machine_mode); -void aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool); +void aarch64_expand_epilogue (rtx_call_insn *); rtx aarch64_ptrue_all (unsigned int); opt_machine_mode aarch64_ptrue_all_mode (rtx); rtx aarch64_convert_sve_data_to_pred (rtx, machine_mode, rtx); diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc index fd1114b52..055b436b1 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc @@ -10046,7 +10046,7 @@ aarch64_use_return_insn_p (void) from a deallocated stack, and we optimize the unwind records by emitting them all together if possible. */ void -aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall) +aarch64_expand_epilogue (rtx_call_insn *sibcall) { poly_int64 initial_adjust = cfun->machine->frame.initial_adjust; HOST_WIDE_INT callee_adjust = cfun->machine->frame.callee_adjust; @@ -10194,7 +10194,7 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall) explicitly authenticate. */ if (aarch64_return_address_signing_enabled () - && (for_sibcall || !TARGET_ARMV8_3)) + && (sibcall || !TARGET_ARMV8_3)) { switch (aarch64_ra_sign_key) { @@ -10212,7 +10212,7 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall) } /* Stack adjustment for exception handler. */ - if (crtl->calls_eh_return && !for_sibcall) + if (crtl->calls_eh_return && !sibcall) { /* We need to unwind the stack by the offset computed by EH_RETURN_STACKADJ_RTX. We have already reset the CFA @@ -10223,7 +10223,7 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (bool for_sibcall) } emit_use (gen_rtx_REG (DImode, LR_REGNUM)); - if (!for_sibcall) + if (!sibcall) emit_jump_insn (ret_rtx); } @@ -28246,6 +28246,9 @@ aarch64_libgcc_floating_mode_supported_p #undef TARGET_HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK #define TARGET_HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK true +#undef TARGET_EMIT_EPILOGUE_FOR_SIBCALL +#define TARGET_EMIT_EPILOGUE_FOR_SIBCALL aarch64_expand_epilogue + struct gcc_target targetm = TARGET_INITIALIZER; #include "gt-aarch64.h" diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md index 7267a74d6..a78476c8a 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md @@ -871,16 +871,7 @@ [(clobber (const_int 0))] "" " - aarch64_expand_epilogue (false); - DONE; - " -) - -(define_expand "sibcall_epilogue" - [(clobber (const_int 0))] - "" - " - aarch64_expand_epilogue (true); + aarch64_expand_epilogue (nullptr); DONE; " ) diff --git a/gcc/doc/tm.texi b/gcc/doc/tm.texi index d930d233d..369f4b8da 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/tm.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/tm.texi @@ -11703,6 +11703,14 @@ the hook might return true if the prologue and epilogue need to switch between instruction sets. @end deftypefn +@deftypefn {Target Hook} void TARGET_EMIT_EPILOGUE_FOR_SIBCALL (rtx_call_insn *@var{call}) +If defined, this hook emits an epilogue sequence for sibling (tail) +call instruction @var{call}. Another way of providing epilogues +for sibling calls is to define the @code{sibcall_epilogue} instruction +pattern; the main advantage of this hook over the pattern is that it +has access to the call instruction. +@end deftypefn + @deftypefn {Target Hook} void TARGET_MACHINE_DEPENDENT_REORG (void) If non-null, this hook performs a target-specific pass over the instruction stream. The compiler will run it at all optimization levels, diff --git a/gcc/doc/tm.texi.in b/gcc/doc/tm.texi.in index 19eabec48..748b0777a 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/tm.texi.in +++ b/gcc/doc/tm.texi.in @@ -7710,6 +7710,8 @@ to by @var{ce_info}. @hook TARGET_USE_LATE_PROLOGUE_EPILOGUE +@hook TARGET_EMIT_EPILOGUE_FOR_SIBCALL + @hook TARGET_MACHINE_DEPENDENT_REORG @hook TARGET_INIT_BUILTINS diff --git a/gcc/function.cc b/gcc/function.cc index 7c90b5f23..ddab43ca4 100644 --- a/gcc/function.cc +++ b/gcc/function.cc @@ -6209,7 +6209,17 @@ thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns (void) if (!(CALL_P (insn) && SIBLING_CALL_P (insn))) continue; - if (rtx_insn *ep_seq = targetm.gen_sibcall_epilogue ()) + rtx_insn *ep_seq; + if (targetm.emit_epilogue_for_sibcall) + { + start_sequence (); + targetm.emit_epilogue_for_sibcall (as_a<rtx_call_insn *> (insn)); + ep_seq = get_insns (); + end_sequence (); + } + else + ep_seq = targetm.gen_sibcall_epilogue (); + if (ep_seq) { start_sequence (); emit_note (NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG); @@ -6259,7 +6269,8 @@ reposition_prologue_and_epilogue_notes (void) { if (!targetm.have_prologue () && !targetm.have_epilogue () - && !targetm.have_sibcall_epilogue ()) + && !targetm.have_sibcall_epilogue () + && !targetm.emit_epilogue_for_sibcall) return; /* Since the hash table is created on demand, the fact that it is diff --git a/gcc/target.def b/gcc/target.def index fd4899612..cf9f96eba 100644 --- a/gcc/target.def +++ b/gcc/target.def @@ -4141,6 +4141,15 @@ between instruction sets.", bool, (), hook_bool_void_false) +DEFHOOK +(emit_epilogue_for_sibcall, + "If defined, this hook emits an epilogue sequence for sibling (tail)\n\ +call instruction @var{call}. Another way of providing epilogues\n\ +for sibling calls is to define the @code{sibcall_epilogue} instruction\n\ +pattern; the main advantage of this hook over the pattern is that it\n\ +has access to the call instruction.", + void, (rtx_call_insn *call), NULL) + /* Do machine-dependent code transformations. Called just before delayed-branch scheduling. */ DEFHOOK -- 2.33.0
Locations
Projects
Search
Status Monitor
Help
Open Build Service
OBS Manuals
API Documentation
OBS Portal
Reporting a Bug
Contact
Mailing List
Forums
Chat (IRC)
Twitter
Open Build Service (OBS)
is an
openSUSE project
.
浙ICP备2022010568号-2